- Topic: Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)
- White PaperSeptember 2020
As companies default under their credit agreements, lenders have to decide what course of action is appropriate to effectuate their goals. Should the lender give the borrower breathing room by entering into a forbearance agreement in exchange for certain milestones, or is more aggressive enforcement action required?
- Client AlertJuly 31, 2020
This is the third and final Client Alert of a three-part series relating to executing a Strict Foreclosure. As discussed in our previous Client Alerts, it is imperative to focus on who is going to run the business after consummating the Strict Foreclosure.
- Client AlertJuly 23, 2020
This is the second Client Alert of a three-part series relating to executing a Strict Foreclosure.
- Client AlertStrictly Speaking: Strict Foreclosure Can Provide an Efficient Smooth Exit for Lenders in the Right CircumstancesJuly 16, 2020
This Client Alert is part of a three Alert series. This Alert focuses on when Strict Foreclosure can be a lender’s best option and the potential path to execute a Strict Foreclosure.
- Client AlertBeyond the Four Corners: Seventh Circuit Holds That a UCC Financing Statement May Incorporate a Collateral Description by Reference to Sufficiently “Indicate” the Collateral for Purposes of PerfectionSeptember 26, 2019
In a case of first impression, the Seventh Circuit recently held that a UCC financing statement that incorporates a description of collateral by reference to an unattached security agreement sufficiently “indicates” the collateral, such that a separate and additional description of the collateral is not required to properly perfect a lender’s security interest.
- ArticleStipulated Loss Value Provisions Used for Damages Purposes Held to Be Unenforceable as a Penalty by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New YorkPratt's Journal of Bankruptcy LawJuly/August 2019
In a recent decision, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York held that liquidated damages provisions calculating damages based upon stipulated loss value schedules designed to provide the lessor/owner participant with a return on investment of 4% (and not as a proxy for actual damages) violated New York public policy and were unenforceable as penalties.
- ArticleSecond Time’s a Charm: First Circuit Finds That Financing Statement Amendments Saved Defective Collateral DescriptionThe Banking Law JournalJuly/August 2019
The First Circuit recently found that a UCC filing amendment naming the debtor contained an appropriate name and that, when coupled with a corrected collateral description in the amendment, the bondholders’ lien was perfected and therefore unavoidable under the “strong-arm” provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.
- ArticleA Lease by Any Other Name Would Not Smell as Sweet: Fifth Circuit Denies “True Lease” Status to a “Sale” of SoftwarePratt's Journal of Bankruptcy LawNovember/December 2018
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently affirmed decisions of a Bankruptcy Court and District Court recharacterizing an alleged lease to a disguised financing arrangement. The Court determined that the transaction was “per se” a financing, and therefore did not need to go on to analyze the economic realities of the transaction in detail.
- Client AlertMay 2, 2017
The Uniform Commercial Code affects financial institutions in countless ways. From duties of care for customers to the banks’ inspection of checks, familiarity with the UCC is critical when examining legal disputes. This alert discusses recent developments in UCC law that provide insight into how courts examine these rules and financial institutions’ responsibilities under the UCC.
- Client AlertFebruary 6, 2015
As discussed in our previous client alert on this subject, litigation over whether $1.5 billion in prepetition loans to GM were secured or unsecured has been pending before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. The Second Circuit recently issued a decision upholding the termination.
- Client AlertClient AlertNovember 5, 2014
The Delaware Supreme Court ruled recently that a secured party’s security interest in collateral can be terminated upon the filing of a UCC termination statement even though there was a mistake in the document.