- Topic: CFTC
- Client AlertMay 2, 2017
On April 19, the House Financial Services Committee posted a “discussion draft” of a revised version of the CHOICE Act. The discussion draft contains most of the provisions in last year’s bill with a number of important changes.
- ArticleFinancial CHOICE Act (H.R. 5983) as Guide to Possible Financial Regulatory Reform, Including “Dodd-Frank Repeal”Pratt's Journal of Bankruptcy LawFebruary/March 2017
With Republicans retaining control of both chambers of Congress and Donald Trump elected President, the prospects for financial regulatory reform have changed. Many observers point to the Financial CHOICE Act as the best indication of Republican Congressional aspirations for such reform.
- Client AlertClient AlertSeptember 11, 2015
The National Futures Association recently submitted an interpretive notice proposal to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission that would require NFA members to establish information systems security programs.
- Client AlertCFTC Allows General Solicitations for Certain Exempt Commodity Pools to Align with SEC Regulation D and Rule 144AClient AlertSeptember 12, 2014
The staff of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission recently issued relief for certain exempt commodity pool operators that permits general solicitation and general advertising in connection with offerings of commodity pools.
- Client AlertCFTC Adopts Harmonization Rules for CPOs of Registered Investment Companies; SEC Issues Related GuidanceClient AlertAugust 15, 2013
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission recently adopted final rules regarding compliance obligations for commodity pool operators of investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
- Client AlertClient AlertFebruary 7, 2013
In 2012 the Commodity Futures Trading Commission significantly narrowed the CFTC Rule 4.5 exclusion from the definition of commodity pool operator available to operators of investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
- Client AlertCommodity Pool Regulation of Securitization Vehicles – CFTC Staff Expands Prior Relief and Provides Broad Exclusion from Commodity Pool Definition; Also Provides No Action Relief for Legacy Transactions and Extension of CPO Registration Deadline to MarchChapman Clint AlertDecember 21, 2012
By letter dated December 7, 2012, the Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission released interpretive guidance significantly expanding the scope of its October 11, 2012 interpretive letter. The October 11 Letter confirmed that securitization vehicles that satisfy five criteria, including a requirement that they operate consistent with either Regulation AB or Rule 3a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, should not be “commodity pools” as a result of holding a swap nor should their operators be required to register as “commodity pool operators” under the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC rules.
- Client AlertCFTC Staff Confirms that Certain Securitizations are Not Commodity Pools and Extends Registration Deadline for Certain Commodity PoolsClient AlertOctober 19, 2012
By letter dated October 11, 2012, the Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission 1 released interpretive guidance confirming that certain securitization vehicles should not be included within the definition of “commodity pool” and that operators of such vehicles should not be included within the definition of “commodity pool operator” under the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC rules. Separately, in a no-action letter dated October 11, 2012, the Division conditionally extended the deadline for registration as a commodity pool operator from October 12, 2012 to December 31, 2012 for vehicles that are commodity pools solely by virtue of their involvement with swaps.
- Client AlertCFTC Eliminates and Narrows Key Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading AdvisorsClient AlertMarch 12, 2012
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) recently issued final rule changes:
• narrowing the exclusion from the definition of commodity pool operator (“CPO”) available to mutual funds and other registered investment companies (“RICs”) and their advisers;
• eliminating an exemption from CPO registration available to private fund operators (but keeping another exemption that had also been proposed to be eliminated);
• narrowing and rescinding certain exemptions from commodity trading advisor (“CTA”) registration;
• adding certain risk disclosure statements for CPOs and CTAs with respect to swaps; and
• making certain changes to reporting and certification obligations for entities required to register as CPOs and
• CTAs and entities relying on exclusions and exemptions from registration.
- Client AlertClient AlertMarch 8, 2012
The Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission recently proposed rules and guidelines that would require certain entities to develop and implement a written identity theft prevention program that is designed to detect, prevent, and mitigate identity theft in connection with certain existing accounts or the opening of new accounts.