Overview

Chapman is at the vanguard of the emerging cryptocurrency, digital asset, and blockchain industry. Our attorneys have an unparalleled command of the unique and complex issues surrounding investments and other transactions in this emerging asset class.

Chapman's century of experience as a law firm focused on finance uniquely positions our firm to provide clients with comprehensive advice and deep insight into the developing ecosystem of cryptocurrency, digital assets, and blockchain technology. We understand the evolving needs of the participants in this space and combine creative legal acumen with business and market insight. As this space has matured, so have the diversity, breadth, and depth of our representation.

Chapman attorneys advise clients across legal products, including regulatory, corporate, investment management, tax, and litigation matters, and across borders on multi-jurisdictional mandates. We also maintain close relationships with leading trade organizations, such as the Chamber of Digital Commerce, that represent the industry before regulatory bodies and local and federal governmental bodies, including the US Congress and Securities and Exchange Commission.

Fund Formation and Investing

  • Formation and structuring of ETFs and other 1940 Act-registered investment fund structures, including preparing registration statements and facilitating SEC review process

  • Organization of private investment funds, including hedge funds and venture funds

  • Preparation of private fund documents such as private placement memorandums, limited partnership agreements, trust agreements, escrow agreements, subscription booklets, and investment management agreements

  • Advising on 19b-4 exchange listing applications for publicly traded digital asset investment funds

  • Negotiating side letters with private fund investors and arrangements with administrators and other service providers

  • Negotiating cryptocurrency custody agreements and derivatives trading documentation
  • Advising institutional investors on due diligence considerations associated with investments in private funds investing in digital assets
  • Guidance through evolving regulatory and enforcement landscape, including proceedings and investigations involving federal and state regulatory and law enforcement authorities (Department of Justice, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and various self regulatory organizations, including FINRA, NFA, and national securities exchanges)
  • Risk management and compliance guidance regarding custody, AML, MNPI, registration, and other digital asset enforcement priorities, including developing bespoke compliance manuals, policies, and procedures

SEC, CFTC, and Other Regulations

  • Counseling on SEC, CFTC, and other regulations applicable to asset managers, issuers of virtual currencies and tokens, foundations, DAOs, and other entities operating in the crypto and blockchain space
  • Analysis of whether coins, tokens and other digital assets may be classified as securities or commodities, and the implications of any applicable regulatory frameworks
  • Advising on issues related to both centrally cleared and over-the-counter cryptocurrency derivatives
  • Considerations related to the formation of DAOs, initial coin offerings and other token disbursement programs

Tax Planning and Structuring

  • Evaluating the treatment of cryptocurrencies and derivatives on cryptocurrencies under rules applicable to repurchase and lending transactions, straddles, wash sales, constructive sales, mandatory and elective mark- to-market recognition of gains and losses
  • Evaluating tax consequences of cryptocurrency investments to different taxpayers in light of IRS guidance that cryptocurrencies are "property" and applicable tax treatment of air drops, staking, lending, other DeFi activities, including grantor trust and publicly traded partnership issues
  • Determining whether a fund is engaged in a US-trade or business and evaluating the application of safe harbor rules to various cryptocurrencies

Corporate and M&A Practice

  • Advising clients on public market mergers and acquisitions with and of crypto and blockchain companies
  • Guidance on infrastructure partnership and commercial arrangements with organizations that mint and issue digital assets
  • Assistance with entity formation, financings, and joint ventures for companies creating and developing digital assets
  • Advising on the integration of digital assets into advertising, marketing, and other consumer-facing activities and related legal considerations


Transaction Highlights

  • Representing the first to market spot litecoin and hedera ETFs
  • Representing the first to market solana staking ETF
  • Representing three of the first to market spot bitcoin ETFs
  • Representing the first to market blockchain ETF
  • Representing the second to market bitcoin futures ETF
  • Advise 1933 Act exchange-traded products on new and novel structures to advance digital asset strategies
  • Represented the sponsors of privately offered single- and multi-digital asset trusts that offer exposure to various cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Polkadot (DOT), Avalanche (AVA), TRON (TRX), Algorand (ALGO), and HBAR, among others, as well as those pursuing a "staking" strategy
  • Advise privately offered trusts holding cryptocurrencies and other digital assets seeking to "uplist" their shares to OTCQX
  • Advise registered investment advisers offering private funds that engage in stablecoin lending to large cryptocurrency exchanges
  • Co-counsel to an institutional cryptocurrency wallet and custody platform in the sale of its institutional bitcoin custody business
  • Represented a financial services firm that serves as a third-party key agent for digital asset/crypto-collateralized loans, including bitcoin- and ether-backed loans, originated by a decentralized platform operated by a financial technology company
  • Represented a cryptocurrency firm in establishing a lending program based upon and backed by cryptocurrency accounts
  • Represented digital asset custodians on regulatory and contract matters
  • Represented a member of a stablecoin consortium project on regulatory and contractual matters
  • Represented sponsors and advisers of registered and private investment vehicles on formation, securities law, and commodities issues, as well as ongoing compliance and best practices
  • Represented digital asset lending platforms on regulatory matters
  • Represented participants on a blockchain-based loan purchase platform
  • Advised a servicing agent on regulatory and contract issues relating to participating in a digital asset lending platform
  • Advised a data platform on regulatory and operational issues

Concentrations

Related Practices

People

Practice Leader

Insights

Cryptocurrency, Digital Assets, and Blockchain Updates

  • Chapman Insights

    Read the latest edition of On-Chain Spotlight for key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the Blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Chapman Insights

    Read the latest edition of On-Chain Spotlight for key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the Blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Chapman Insights

    Read the latest edition of On-Chain Spotlight for key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the Blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Chapman Insights

    Read the latest edition of On-Chain Spotlight for key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the Blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Chapman Insights

    Read the latest edition of On-Chain Spotlight for key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the Blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Client Alert

    On April 13, 2026, the Staff of the SEC’s Division of Trading and Markets issued a statement (“Statement”) setting out its views on when a person that creates, offers, and/or operates certain user interfaces used to prepare transactions in crypto asset securities (a “Covered User Interface Provider”) may do so without registering as a broker-dealer under Section 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Statement is the latest in a series of federal regulatory developments aimed at reconciling crypto industry practices within the existing securities and derivatives regulatory framework, following the SEC and CFTC’s joint guidance on the status of certain crypto assets and the CFTC’s recent no-action relief for a crypto wallet technology vendor. Commissioner Hester M. Peirce issued a separate statement commending the Staff but calling for a more permanent approach.

  • News

    Chapman welcomes partner Cris Cicala to our Asset Securitization and Structured Finance Group; Cryptocurrency, Digital Assets, and Blockchain Group; and Compliance, Regulatory and Payments Group. Cris has an extensive digital assets practice advising funds, financial institutions, fintech companies, and digital-native market participants in matters involving digital assets and blockchain. He also has particularly deep experience in representing Latin American and European financial institutions and their US branches in both US domestic and cross-border transactions.

  • Chapman Insights

    Read the latest edition of On-Chain Spotlight for key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the Blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Chapman Insights

    Read the latest edition of On-Chain Spotlight for key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the Blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Chapman Insights

    Read the latest edition of On-Chain Spotlight for key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the Blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Chapman Insights

    Read the latest edition of On-Chain Spotlight for key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the Blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Article
    Practical Law

    Chapman partners Juan Arciniegas, Curtis Doty, Peter Hong, and Morrison Warren co-authored an article published by Thomson Reuters / Practical Law, providing essential guidance on the rapidly evolving landscape of cryptocurrency. As digital assets continue their march into mainstream finance, a new generation of investment products is reshaping how institutions and individuals gain exposure. Navigating this space requires understanding critical distinctions that carry real consequences for performance, costs, and compliance.

  • Client Alert

    On January 28, 2026, the SEC Staff (the “Staff”) from the Division of Corporation Finance, the Division of Investment Management, and the Division of Trading and Markets issued a joint statement on tokenized securities. The statement builds upon and expands Commissioner Peirce’s July 2025 remarks, “Enchanting, but Not Magical,” emphasizing that innovations in tokenization should be approached as a process of regulated evolution. The statement provides the Staff’s views on tokenized versions of securities that are issued as crypto-assets and recorded on a distributed ledger technology (DLT), such as a blockchain network.

  • Chapman Insights

    Read our synopsis of key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Client Alert

    On December 8, 2025, the Market Participants Division, Division of Market Oversight, and Division of Clearing and Risk (collectively, “Divisions”) of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) issued guidance on the use of tokenized assets as collateral in the trading of futures and swaps. The Guidance follows a September 2025 request for comment on the use of tokenized collateral in derivatives markets, including on the recommendations made in a November 2024 report of the CFTC’s Global Markets Advisory Committee (“GMAC”).

    Consistent with the GMAC’s recommendations, the Guidance acknowledges that CFTC regulations do not require any particular technology or operational infrastructure to transfer or hold eligible collateral, stating instead that “assets retain their margin eligibility so long as they satisfy applicable regulatory requirements”. The Guidance largely reiterates existing regulations without adding tokenization-specific standards. Nonetheless, the Guidance is significant because it reflects the Divisions’ concurrence with the GMAC’s conclusion that no changes to CFTC regulations are needed, and it identifies areas where
    risk-focused analysis is expected.

    This bulletin highlights certain key points in the Guidance, focusing on issues raised by the unique attributes of tokenization and considerations relevant to swap dealers subject to CFTC uncleared margin regulations.

  • Video
    Amid growing regulatory activity and accelerating industry adoption, Chapman hosted a cross‑industry panel exploring the growing role of tokenization in financial markets, examining how the technology is advancing, what risks and opportunities it presents, and what market participants should be preparing for next.
  • Client Alert

    On November 10, 2025, the IRS issued Revenue Procedure 2025-31, providing formal guidance addressing how trusts that qualify as investment trusts under Treas. Reg. § 301.7701-4(c) and grantor trusts for Federal income tax purposes can engage in digital asset staking without jeopardizing their favorable tax treatment. This guidance clarifies the conditions under which staking activities may be conducted while maintaining classification as both an investment trust and a grantor trust. The procedure establishes a safe harbor with detailed structural and operational requirements for eligible trusts, providing greater certainty for trustees and beneficiaries navigating digital asset investments. In particular, the safe harbor provides sponsors of trusts operating as crypto asset exchange-traded products (“ETPs”) a grantor trust compliant path to timely meet redemption requests in circumstances when the “unstaking” of a staked digital asset takes longer than the trust’s normal T+1 settlement cycle for redemptions.

  • News

    Chapman welcomes partner Christian Brockman to our Corporate and Securities Department and Investment Management Group. A leader at the intersection of finance and technology, Christian brings a unique commercial perspective from his experience as general counsel to guide private fund sponsors and institutional investors through their most complex transactional and regulatory matters, with a particular focus on the digital asset and cryptocurrency ecosystem.

  • Report

    The Digital Chamber released a new report: "Beyond Merit: How the SEC's Division of Investment Management Blocked Permissible Investments in Digital Assets." The report seeks to provide a workable framework to turn historical Division of Investment Management actions regarding digital assets into a path forward for the increased availability of digital assets in investment company products. Chapman's Rick Coyle and Morrison Warren assisted in the preparation.

  • Client Alert

    Chapman's quarterly Regulatory Update contains an overview of the latest regulatory actions, market happenings, and litigation and enforcement activity in the investment management space.

  • Client Alert

    Chapman's quarterly Regulatory Update contains an overview of the latest regulatory actions, market happenings, and litigation and enforcement activity in the investment management space.

  • Client Alert

    At a time when the digital asset market is badly in need of good news, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) has delivered the long-awaited ISDA Digital Asset Derivatives Definitions (the “Definitions”).

  • Report

    Chapman represented the Chamber of Digital Commerce in connection with its “Spot Bitcoin ETF Initiative” which set out to gain a deep understanding of the industry’s experience in pursuit of a registered Spot Bitcoin ETF and provide insight into the most realistic avenues for ultimately getting the SEC to approve this widely anticipated investment product.

Engagements

News and Events

May 18, 2026

On-Chain Spotlight

Read our synopsis of key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the blockchain and digital assets industry:

Regulatory Developments

  • May 15: The NCUA has published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking establishing operational and risk management standards for permitted payment stablecoin issuers licensed by the agency under the GENIUS Act. Stakeholders are encouraged to review the proposal and submit comments by July 17 – read the press release here.
  • May 14: The Senate Banking Committee advanced the Clarity Act, a landmark crypto market structure bill, with bipartisan support, but continued questions remain for the full Senate over stablecoin rewards, anti-money laundering rules, and ethics provisions for public officials. The bill clarifies regulatory jurisdiction across the crypto sector, restricts interest paid on stablecoins, and maintains legal protections for DeFi developers while aiming to provide consumer safeguards. The bill faces further negotiations and will need to pass through the full Senate and House – read the draft here.
  • May 14: The CFTC issued a blanket no-action letter relieving prediction market platforms listing event contracts from swap data reporting and recordkeeping requirements, aiming to reduce regulatory uncertainty for contracts that technically qualify as "swaps." The move applies to designated contract markets and clearinghouses and comes as the CFTC continues to assert exclusive federal jurisdiction over prediction markets – read the letter here.
  • May 13: The Senate has confirmed Kevin Warsh, President Trump’s nominee, as the next Federal Reserve Chair, succeeding Jerome Powell. Warsh, who has investments in several crypto companies and digital asset projects, was approved 54–45 and will serve a four-year term as Fed Chair, while Powell will remain on the Fed’s board until 2028 – read the announcement here.
  • May 11: Augustus (formerly Ivy) received conditional approval from the OCC to establish Augustus Bank, N.A., as a national bank in the US. Designed to provide programmable, 24/7 clearing for major currencies using stablecoin infrastructure – read the announcement here.

Market Developments

  • May 13: Charles Schwab launched “Schwab Crypto” to a first wave of eligible retail clients, enabling spot bitcoin and ether trading via separate crypto accounts, with custody by Charles Schwab Premier Bank – read about the program here.
  • May 12: Coinbase has expanded its on-chain lending platform by allowing users to borrow up to $100,000 against their Solana (SOL) holdings via Morpho on Base, joining bitcoin, ether, and other crypto collateral options. This follows Coinbase’s broader push into crypto-backed loans (now surpassing $2.3 billion in total originations) and highlights the exchange’s strategy to enhance asset utility despite challenging market conditions – read more in this article.
  • May 12: JPMorgan is launching its second tokenized money market fund on Ethereum, JLTXX, designed to meet GENIUS Act stablecoin reserve requirements by investing in US Treasurys and Treasury-backed overnight repos, with blockchain operations run by its Kinexys unit – read the filing here.
  • May 12: The Ethereum Foundation is backing clear signing adoption by launching a public registry for verified contract descriptors, standardizing on ERC-7730, and providing tooling to help wallets and developers replace blind signing with consistent human-readable transaction descriptions – read the story here.
  • May 11: Boundary Labs said it raised $2 million in a Galaxy Ventures–led pre-seed SAFE round (with token warrants) and plans to launch its institutional stablecoin USBD on Ethereum in early summer 2026, featuring daily on-chain verification of reserves and a separate staked token (sUSBD) for eligible institutions, while USBD itself will not be yield-bearing – read the story here.
  • May 11: Corpay has partnered with BVNK to integrate stablecoin wallets and settlement capabilities into its global payments platform, enabling clients to send, receive, and convert stablecoins alongside fiat currencies and access 24/7 payment settlement – read the statement here.
  • May 11: Circle raised $222 million in an Arc token presale, with investors including a16z crypto, BlackRock, and Apollo. Arc, Circle’s new institutional blockchain, uses USDC as its native gas token and aims to give institutions increased control and efficiency as stablecoin and crypto legislation progresses in the US – read more in this article.
  • May 11: Payward is seeking new funding at a $20 billion valuation as it accelerates acquisitions in derivatives and stablecoin companies and prepares for a potential IPO. Recent deals include the purchases of Bitnomial and Reap, with Payward also confidentially submitting an S-1 to the SEC – read the article here.
  • May 10: At the Consensus Miami conference, executives from PayPal and Google Cloud said the next generation of AI-driven “agentic” commerce will rely on crypto payment rails. Both companies are pushing open standards like Google’s new Agentic Payments Protocol (AP2) and PayPal’s PYUSD stablecoin to scale merchant and agent participation – read more in this article.
  • May 8: Payward announced that it filed an application with the OCC for a national trust company charter that would establish Payward National Trust Company to provide federally regulated digital-asset custody services – read the story here.

Litigation, Enforcement, and Examination Developments

  • May 12: A D.C. federal appeals panel heard arguments in the Bitcoin Fog case, questioning whether undercover transactions in Washington, D.C. established proper venue and scrutinizing the reliability of the FBI’s “IP overlap” analysis linking the defendant to the crypto mixing service – read the story here.
  • May 12: Aave and other parties impacted by the Kelp DAO hack have launched a binding Arbitrum governance vote to transfer $71 million in disputed ETH into Aave’s custody, following a court order related to North Korean terrorism judgment claims. The assets will remain restricted pending further court action – read the court order here.
  • May 12: The CFTC filed an amicus brief in the Sixth Circuit in KalshiEx LLC v. Schuler, again asserting exclusive jurisdiction over prediction markets and arguing that federal CFTC regulation preempts state efforts to regulate them – read the press release here.
  • May 8: VM Innovations I LLC, a Texas company, sued Coinbase in federal court alleging infringement and inducement of infringement of seven blockchain-related patents by the Coinbase Wallet and Base products, seeking injunctive relief plus damages and attorney fees – read more in this article.
  • May 8: Investors in a proposed class action over a $328 million cryptocurrency fraud at Goliath Ventures amended their suit, adding large banks and a major cryptocurrency exchange as defendants. The expanded complaint alleges the financial institutions aided or enabled the Ponzi-like scheme through actions such as processing investor funds, maintaining accounts used for fraud, and converting funds into cryptocurrency – read the complaint here.
Download a PDF of this newsletter.
  Join our Blockchain and Digital Assets mailing list.  

White button that says Subscribe.


 
Upcoming

Connect with our attorneys at these industry events.

 
 
Blue graphic that says Sponsor Spring 2026 ETP Forum June 2 New York, NY

Moderator
Morrison Warren | Partner
Digital Assets: The Next Phase of Integration

 
Blue graphic that says ICI 2026 ETF Conference June 8 - 10 Nashville, TN

Attending
Rick Coyle | Partner
Walt Draney | Partner
Dan Fallon | Partner
Sean Snider | Partner
Morrison Warren | Partner
James Borrasso | Associate
Kathryn Maass | Associate

 
Blue graphic that says Sponsor ETFGI Global ETFs Insights Summit September 29 New York, NY
 
Blue graphic that says Sponsor Fordham Law Blockchain Regulatory Symposium October 5 New York, NY
 
 

Past Editions

May

Download a PDF of the May 11, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the May 4, 2026 edition.

April

Download a PDF of the April 27, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the April 20, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the April 13, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the April 7, 2026 edition.

March

Download a PDF of the March 30, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the March 26, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the March 16, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the March 6, 2026 edition.

February

Download a PDF of the February 27, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the February 20, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the February 13, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the February 6, 2026 edition.

January

Download a PDF of the January 23, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the January 16, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the January 9, 2026 edition.


   

Join our Blockchain and Digital Assets mailing list.

Blue button that says Subscribe

GENIUS Act Tracker

As of May 15, 2026

Jump to: GENIUS Act Rulemaking Timeline  |  GENIUS Act Reporting Requirements


Download a PDF of this page.


The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act (the “GENIUS Act”) enacted in July 2025 instructs the prudential bank regulators and the U.S. Treasury to promulgate regulations, and coordinate as appropriate, implementing the GENIUS Act. Majority of the implementation final rules must be promulgated are within one year of the statute’s effective date, and GENIUS Act officially takes effect on the earlier of January 18, 2027, or 120 days after final rules are issued. The timeline to promulgate each regulation is set out below along with updates on the status of the notice and comment processes that each of the FDIC, the Federal Reserve, OCC, NCUA, and the Department of the Treasury (FinCEN/OFAC) have initiated to comply with the rulemaking requirements set out in the GENIUS Act.

GENIUS Act Rulemaking Timeline

Required Rulemaking Responsible Regulator Timeline to Promulgate Required Regulation Status GENIUS Act Section
Issuance and treatment of payment stablecoins Treasury Secretary July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on GENIUS Act Implementation issued by the Department of Treasury on September 18, 2025; as published in the Federal Register on September 19, 2025 (“Treasury ANPRM”). Comment period closed November 4, 2025. §§3(c)-(d)
12 U.S.C. § 5902
Capital, liquidity, risk management, amendments to capital requirements

FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, NCUA, and any applicable State Payment Stablecoin Regulator

July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment)

Implementing the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act for the Issuance of Stablecoins by Entities Subject to the Jurisdiction of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued on February 25, 2026; as published in the Federal Register on March 2, 2026 (“OCC Implementation NPRM”). Comment period closes May 1, 2026.

GENIUS Act Requirements and Standards for FDIC‑Supervised Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuers and Insured Depository Institutions issued on April 7, 2026; as published in the Federal Register on April 10, 2026 (“FDIC Implementation NPRM”). Comment period closes June 9, 2026.

Implementing the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act for the Issuance of Stablecoins by Entities Subject to the Jurisdiction of the National Credit Union Administration; as published in the Federal Register on May 18, 2026 ("NCUA Implementation NPRM"). Comment period closes July 17, 2026.

§ 4(a)(4)
12 U.S.C. § 5903(a)(4)
General regulations for financial stability and implementation of the principal requirements of § 4(a) OCC, in coordination with other relevant payment stablecoin regulators July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) OCC Implementation NPRM

§ 4(b)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(b)
General regulations for implementation of and compliance with the principal requirements of § 4(a)

FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, NCUA, and any applicable State Payment Stablecoin Regulator

July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment)

OCC Implementation NPRM

FDIC Implementation NPRM

NCUA Implementation NPRM

§ 4(h)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(h)
Processes for applications by, and regulation and supervision of, Federal‑qualified payment stablecoin issuers

FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA

July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment)

OCC Implementation NPRM

FDIC Implementation NPRM

Investments in and Licensing of Permitted Payment Stablecoins Issuers issued on February 11, 2026; as published in the Federal Register on February 12, 2026 (“NCUA Licensing NPRM”). Comment period closed April 13, 2026.

Approval Requirements for Issuance of Payment Stablecoins by Subsidiaries of FDIC‑Supervised Insured Depository Institutions issued on December 16, 2025; as published in the Federal Register on December 19, 2025 (“FDIC Licensing NPRM”). Comment period extended from February 17, 2026 to May 18, 2026.

§ 5(a)(2)(A)

12 U.S.C. § 5904(a)(2)
Regulation of payment stablecoin issuance FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment)

OCC Implementation NPRM

FDIC Implementation NPRM

NCUA Implementation NPRM

NCUA Licensing NPRM

FDIC Licensing NPRM

§ 5(g)

12 U.S.C. § 5904(g)

Federal Reserve backup enforcement authority against State‑qualified permitted payment stablecoin issuers in unusual and exigent circumstances

Federal Reserve July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Pending

§ 7(e)(1)(B)

12 U.S.C. § 5906(e)(2)

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency backup enforcement authority against State‑qualified permitted payment stablecoin issuers that are nonbanks in unusual and exigent circumstances

OCC July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) OCC Implementation NPRM

§ 7(e)(1)(B)

12 U.S.C. § 5906(e)(2)
Criteria regarding resumption of compliance by a foreign payment stablecoin issuer Treasury Secretary July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Treasury ANPRM

§ 8(b)(3)(B)

12 U.S.C. § 5907(b)(3)(B)
Standards for registration requests and appeals process of foreign payment stablecoin issuers OCC July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) OCC Implementation NPRM

§ 18(c)(1)(E)

12 U.S.C. § 5916(c)(1)(E)
Rules applying BSA/AML and sanctions obligations to permitted payment stablecoin issuers Treasury Secretary Presumed—July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) deadline may apply Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuer Anti‑Money Laundering/Countering the Financing of Terrorism Program and Sanctions Compliance Program Requirements issued on April 8, 2026; as published in the Federal Register on April 10, 2026 (“Treasury AML NPRM”). Comment period closes June 9, 2026.

§ 4(a)(5)(B)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(a)(5)(B)
Rules implementing the anti‑tying provision and permitting exceptions Federal Reserve, in consultation with the FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA as related to exceptions to the anti‑tying provision No deadline—regulators “may” issue such orders Pending

§ 4(a)(8)(B)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(a)(8)(B)
Rules clarifying the application of ownership limitations, including restrictions on payment stablecoin issuance by U.S. public companies and companies not domiciled in the United States that are “not predominantly engaged” in financial activities Stablecoin Certification Review Committee (Treasury Secretary, Federal Reserve Chair, and FDIC Chair) July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Pending

§ 4(a)(12)(D)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(a)(12)
Principles for assessment of whether state regulatory frameworks are “substantially similar” to federal frameworks Treasury Secretary Presumed—July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) deadline may apply GENIUS Act Broad‑Based Principles for Determining Whether a State‑Level Regulatory Regime Is Substantially Similar to the Federal Regulatory Framework issued on April 1, 2026; as published in the Federal Register on April 3, 2026 (“Treasury Substantially Similar NPRM”). Comment period closes June 2, 2026.

§ 4(c)(2)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(c)(2)

Certifications from state payment stablecoin regulators that the state‑level regulatory regime satisfies applicable criteria and is “substantially similar” to the federal framework, and annual recertifications of the accuracy of the initial certification

State Payment Stablecoin Regulator July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Pending

§ 4(c)(4)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(c)(4)

Established process for expedited review of state regimes for substantial similarity to the federal regime if the state has a prudential regulatory regime in effect by January 14, 2026

Stablecoin Certification Review Committee (Treasury Secretary, Federal Reserve Chair, and FDIC Chair) Responsible regulator shall endeavor for the process must be in effect by January 14, 2026 to enable expedited review Pending

§ 4(c)(7)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(c)(7)
State‑level requirements for state‑qualified payment stablecoin issuers may be issued to the same extent as federal regulations State Payment Stablecoin Regulator No deadline—regulators “may” issue such orders Pending

§ 7(d)

12 U.S.C. § 5906(d)
Public comment on anti‑money laundering innovation Treasury Secretary Beginning August 17, 2025 for a period of 60 days

Treasury ANPRM

Treasury Issues Request for Comment Related to the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act issued on August 18, 2025; comment period closed October 17, 2025 (“Treasury Illicit Finance RFC”).

§ 9(a)

12 U.S.C. § 5908(a)
Rulemaking to mitigate illicit financial activity FinCEN July 18, 2028 (three years after enactment) Pending

§ 9(d)

12 U.S.C. § 5908(a)
Prescribe terms and conditions under which exceptions to custody requirements apply FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA No deadline—regulators “may” issue such orders Pending

§ 10(c)(2)(C)

12 U.S.C. § 5909(c)(2)(C)
Assessment of the necessity of interoperability standards among permitted payment stablecoin issuers and the broader digital finance ecosystem FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA, in consultation with NIST Unclear—July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) deadline may apply Pending

§ 12

12 U.S.C. § 5912
Review of existing regulations applicable to regulated entities

FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA

Unclear—July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) deadline may apply

Pending

NCUA Implementation NPRM

§ 16(b)

12 U.S.C. § 5915(b)
Issuance of rules that may be required to regulate foreign payment stablecoin issuers offering and selling payment stablecoins in the United States Treasury Secretary July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Treasury ANPRM

§ 18(b)(6)

12 U.S.C. § 5916(b)(6)
Creation and implementation of reciprocal arrangements or bilateral agreements between the U.S. and comparable payment stablecoin regulatory regimes Treasury Secretary July 18, 2027 (two years after enactment) Treasury ANPRM

§ 18(d)(3)

12 U.S.C. § 5916(d)(3)

GENIUS Act Reporting Requirements

In addition to the rulemaking activity summarized above, the GENIUS Act requires the primary federal payment stablecoin regulators, including the FDIC, NCUA, Federal Reserve and OCC for banks and the OCC for non-bank and state-supervised PPSIs, the Treasury Secretary and/or the Attorney General, to produce reports for the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate; the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives; or the Director of the Office of Financial Research, as summarized below.

Required Reports Responsible Regulator Due Date Status GENIUS Act Section
Justification for the determination of Unusual and Exigent Circumstances in approving safe harbors Treasury Secretary Prior to issuing such safe harbor Pending

§ 3(c)

12 U.S.C. § 5902
National security coordination with permitted payment stablecoin issuers Attorney General and Treasury Secretary July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Pending

§ 4(a)(6)(C)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(a)(6)(C)

Notification to Congress upon beginning the processing of applications from prospective permitted payment stablecoin issuers

FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA As‑needed Pending

§ 5(e)

12 U.S.C. § 5904(e)

Annual reports to Congress on applications from prospective permitted payment stablecoin issuers that have been pending for at least 180 days

FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA Annually Pending

§ 5(e)

12 U.S.C. § 5904(e)
Reports regarding secondary trading of a payment stablecoin issued by a foreign payment stablecoin issuer Treasury Secretary As‑needed within seven days after the applicable waiver or license is issued Pending

§ 8(c)(4)

12 U.S.C. § 5907(c)(4)
Report addressing illicit finance‑related recommendations, including detection, risk assessment, and legislative recommendations Treasury Secretary January 14, 2026 (180 days after enactment) Report to Congress from the Secretary of the Treasury on Innovative Technologies to Counter Illicit Finance Involving Digital Assets (March 2026)

§ 9(e)

12 U.S.C. § 5908(e)
Report providing findings of a study regarding insolvency proceedings of permitted payment stablecoin issuers FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA July 18, 2028 (three years after enactment) Pending

§ 11(h)

12 U.S.C. § 5910
Report confirming and describing regulations issued to carry out the GENIUS Act Federal Banking Agencies (FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC) January 14, 2026 (180 days after enactment) Pending

§ 13(c)

12 U.S.C. § 5913(c)
Report providing findings of a study of non‑payment stablecoins, including endogenously collateralized stablecoins Treasury Secretary July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Pending

§ 14(a)(2)

12 U.S.C. § 5914(a)(2)
Report providing information on the status of the payment stablecoin industry, including trends, applications for permitted payment stablecoin issuer status, and potential financial stability risks FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, NCUA, and any applicable State Payment Stablecoin Regulator July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Pending

§ 15(a)

12 U.S.C. § 5914(a)
Incorporation of the above report into its annual report to Congress pursuant to the Dodd‑Frank Act Financial Stability Oversight Council

Annually, beginning July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment)

Pending

§ 15(b)

12 U.S.C. § 5914(b)

We have always been focused on finance.

  • 1913
    TS Chapman partners with Henry Cutler to form Chapman and Cutler
  • 1st
    Chapman's first client in 1913 is still a client of the firm today
  • 22
    Diverse financial practices serving regional, national, and global clients
  • 6
    Offices across the country and in key US financial centers

Chapman and Cutler LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Strictly Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions. Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. When using a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages. These do not store any personal information.

Marketing Cookies

Marketing cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek