Chapman Sidebar

A defaulting borrower and its guarantors, owing millions of dollars, claim that a series of emails sent to the lender’s attorney constitutes a legally binding settlement agreement to modify the loan agreement and to settle the matter for pennies on the dollar. This was not the lender’s intent. The lender merely intended to explore terms on which the parties might agree to resolve the default, while the lender investigated the guarantors’ financial condition. If the borrower or guarantors file a lawsuit to enforce the proffered terms, is the lender bound by the terms set forth in the emails?

Related People

We have always been focused on finance.

  • 1913
    TS Chapman partners with Henry Cutler to form Chapman and Cutler
  • 1st
    Chapman's first client in 1913 is still a client of the firm today
  • 22
    Diverse financial practices serving regional, national, and global clients
  • 6
    Offices across the country and in key US financial centers

We use cookies to deliver our online services. Details of the cookies we use and instructions on how to disable them are set out in our Privacy Policy. By using this website you agree to our use of cookies.