Client Alerts & Publications

On April 24, 2025, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”) withdrew its previously issued supervisory guidance for banks related to certain crypto-asset activities. This development marks the latest in a series of coordinated regulatory shifts by federal banking agencies toward a more innovation-supportive framework for digital asset activities, building on the recent action of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) in Interpretive Letter 1183.

On March 19, 2025, the staff of the Division of Investment Management (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) updated its Marketing Compliance Frequently Asked Questions (“March 2025 FAQs”) to provide no-action relief with respect to the presentation of extracted performance, as well as clarity on whether certain portfolio or investment characteristics constitute “performance” for purposes of Rule 206(4)-1 (the “Marketing Rule”) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”).   

On April 4, 2025, the Division of Corporation Finance (“Corp Fin”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued a statement (“Statement”) that the offer and sale of “Covered Stablecoins,” as defined by Corp Fin, does not involve the offer and sale of securities within the meaning of Section 2(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) or Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Accordingly, Corp Fin stated that “persons involved in the process of ‘minting’ (or creating) and redeeming Covered Stablecoins do not need to register those transactions with the SEC under the Securities Act or fall within one of the Securities Act’s exemption from registration.”

In this article, authors Michael Friedman, Chapman's Israel practice head and practice leader for the firm's Special Situations and Restructuring Group, and associate Helena Honig, provide perspective on distressed investments in real estate in the United States and unique opportunities for investors willing to accept increased levels of risk to generate value and higher returns.

Changes are coming for health care organizations that are borrowers with respect to municipal securities. New data standards required under the Financial Data Transparency Act of 2022 (FDTA) could take effect as early as 2027. In the March/April 2025 issue of AHLA’s Health Law Connections, Chapman partners Mary Kimura and Hillary Phelps provide a summary of the FDTA and the joint standards proposed in August 2024, including reactions from municipal securities industry participants and a look ahead at the next stages of the rulemaking process. They also explore potential impacts of the new data standards on health care organizations and systems.

On March 7, 2025, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) issued Interpretive Letter 1183, which confirms that national banks may engage in certain crypto-assets activities and reverses the previous requirement that they first obtain a supervisory non-objection letter before engaging in such activities.

As reported in our recent series of Client Alerts, the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) and the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s (the “Treasury Department”) Financial Crimes Enforcement Network’s (“FinCEN”) related beneficial ownership information (“BOI”) reporting rules have been the subject of a multitude of lawsuits, injunctions and announcements.

The Digital Chamber released a new report: "Beyond Merit: How the SEC's Division of Investment Management Blocked Permissible Investments in Digital Assets." The report seeks to provide a workable framework to turn historical Division of Investment Management actions regarding digital assets into a path forward for the increased availability of digital assets in investment company products. Chapman's Rick Coyle and Morrison Warren assisted in the preparation.

The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) has released its 2025 Annual Performance Plan, outlining its strategic priorities, resource allocations, and regulatory focus for the fiscal year. This plan is built around three primary goals: ensuring a safe, sound, and resilient system of cooperative credit that safeguards consumers; enhancing financial well-being through access to equitable and affordable financial products and services; and optimizing organizational performance to effectively fulfill the NCUA’s mission. While the NCUA will remain centered on these primary goals, the shifts in federal administration in Washington, in particular among financial regulatory agencies, may signal potential changes to the NCUA priorities and this Plan.

On February 17, 2025, in light of the Supreme Court’s grant of a stay in the Texas Top Cop Shop case, the District Court stayed the nationwide preliminary injunction of the CTA issued in Smith v. U.S. Department of Treasury. As a result, the BOI reporting rules are now once again enforceable and in effect.

Chapman's quarterly Regulatory Update contains an overview of the latest regulatory actions, market happenings, and litigation and enforcement activity in the investment management space.

The US derivatives markets are renowned for their depth and innovation, drawing participants from across the globe. These markets have a long‑established history of trading futures contracts on US Treasury securities, US and non‑US stock indexes, and physical commodities, as well as listed options on these instruments. In recent years, new types of contracts based on novel asset classes and indices have emerged. Examples of these new asset classes include cryptocurrencies, volatility, environmental attributes, and macroeconomic indicators. In addition to listed contracts, over‑the‑counter (OTC) derivatives may be executed bilaterally and either submitted for clearing or maintained as bilateral transactions if they are not subject to mandatory clearing requirements.

On January 23, 2025, the Supreme Court granted a stay of the District Court’s nationwide injunction pending any further appeals. However, a different judge in the same District Court recently issued an order in a separate case (Smith v. U.S. Department of Treasury) which enjoined FinCEN from enforcing the CTA against the plaintiffs in the case and, notably, stayed the effective date of the BOI reporting rules.

On December 31, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that mattress company Serta Simmons Bedding, LLC (“Serta”) violated the “sacred right” of its lenders to ratable repayment by placing more than $1 billion of new super-priority debt that would have priority over its existing loans and offering to “purchase” or “exchange” only a portion of its existing indebtedness for such new indebtedness, The Fifth Circuit held that such an exchange was not a permitted “open market purchase” under the terms of the existing indebtedness. While still significant, this ruling underscores the importance of the language in existing and future debt instruments which could either facilitate or inhibit similar transactions involving “liability management” or “lender-on-lender violence”.

As reported in our recent series of Client Alerts, on December 3, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (the “District Court”) issued a nationwide preliminary injunction that temporarily blocked enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) and the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network’s (“FinCEN”) related beneficial ownership information (“BOI”) reporting rules. On December 23, 2024, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals (the “Court of Appeals”) granted the government’s motion to stay the District Court’s preliminary injunction pending its appeal of that injunction order. As a result of the Court of Appeal’s ruling, FinCEN extended the reporting deadline to January 13, 2025. 

As previously noted in our Client Alert, on December 3, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (the “District Court”) issued a nationwide preliminary injunction that temporarily blocked enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) and the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) related beneficial ownership information (“BOI”) reporting rules, and as noted in our most recent Client Alert, the government filed an emergency motion with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals (the “Court of Appeals”) to stay the District Court’s preliminary injunction pending its appeal of that injunction order.  

As discussed in our previous Client Alerts on December 9 and December 13, on December 3, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (the “District Court”) issued a nationwide preliminary injunction that temporarily blocks enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) and the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) related beneficial ownership information (“BOI”) reporting rules.

On December 3, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a nationwide preliminary injunction that temporarily blocks enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) and the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) related beneficial ownership information (“BOI”) reporting rules. On December 12, 2024, the government filed a motion to stay the preliminary injunction pending its appeal.

On December 3, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a nationwide preliminary injunction that temporarily blocks enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) and the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) related beneficial ownership information (“BOI”) reporting rules.

A well-trodden path for banks to achieve regulatory capital reductions by mitigating credit risk is through a synthetic securitization, either by issuing credit-linked notes (CLNs) or engaging in bespoke bilateral credit derivative transactions. These transactions—while complex to execute—offer the significant advantage of transferring risk on a large, diversified portfolio of obligors, allowing investors to evaluate credit risk on a statistical basis. This lessens the need for investor diligence at the level of individual obligations, which facilitates risk transfer on obligors for whom information might be limited or costly to digest.

Chapman wrote the book on the marketplace lending regulatory landscape that the entire industry has come to rely upon. First published in 2013, the 2024 update covers a vast array of topics affecting the marketplace lending industry.

The Division of Examinations of the Securities and Exchange Commission published its examination priorities for fiscal year 2025. The 2025 Exam Priorities reflect practices, products, and services the Division believes present heightened risks to investors and the U.S. capital markets.

There have been several recent notable enforcement actions, including continued enforcement by the SEC and CFTC against off-channel communications, as well as an SEC fraud settlement with Macquarie Investment Management Business Trust.

Chapman's quarterly Regulatory Update contains an overview of the latest regulatory actions, market happenings, and litigation and enforcement activity in the investment management space.

On September 12, 2024, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) adopted amendments to CFTC Regulation 4.7 (Reg. 4.7), a rule that provides exemptions from the broader compliance requirements under Part 4 of the CFTC regulations (Part 4) for registered commodity pool operators (CPOs) with respect to pools (4.7 pools) offered solely to “Qualified Eligible Persons” (QEPs) and registered commodity trading advisors (CTAs) that advise or manage commodity trading accounts of QEPs. The amendments (i) increase the financial thresholds in the “Portfolio Requirement” of the QEP definition and (ii) permit CPOs of fund of fund pools offered solely to QEPs to provide monthly account statements within 45 days of the month-end, rather than providing quarterly account statements within 30 days of the quarter-end. The CFTC chose not to adopt, at this time, the proposed minimum QEP disclosures.

On August 22, 2024, a proposed rule (the “Proposed Joint Rule”) mandated by the Financial Data Transparency Act of 2022 (the “FDTA”) and adopted by nine federal financial regulators, including the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” and, together with the other eight regulators, the “Covered Agencies”), was published in the Federal Register. 

Chapman's white paper provides a summary of the interval fund and tender offer fund structures, including their basic legal framework, their investment restrictions, how they are distributed and how they facilitate redemptions. It also provides a comparison of interval funds and tender offer funds, both to each other and to other types of investment companies.

The Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”), rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) pursuant thereto, and state laws governing the activities of investment advisers determine when persons engaged in the business of providing investment advice must or may register as an investment adviser with either the SEC or the relevant state authorities.

On June 27, 2024, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of the United States Trustee, who had objected to Purdue’s plan of reorganization that granted releases of third party claims to members of the Sackler family in exchange for their contribution of up to $6 billion to the Purdue bankruptcy estate. Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the majority, found that the type of relief being granted to the Sacklers (i.e., a blanket shield from all existing or potential liability relating to the opioid crisis) represented the kind of “discharge” only available to debtors who have “placed all their assets on the table.”

In a decision that should help restore investors’ faith in the protections afforded municipal bondholders under the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), on June 12, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (the “First Circuit” or the “Court”) held that the bondholders (the “Bondholders”) of certain Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) electric revenue bonds (the “Bonds”) have a non-recourse claim against PREPA’s estate in PREPA’s reorganization proceedings under Title III of the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act, 48 U.S.C. §§ 2161-78 (“PROMESA”), for the full principal amount of their outstanding Bonds, plus matured interest, of approximately $8.5 billion, and that the Bonds are secured by PREPA’s current and future Net Revenues.

Despite recent regulatory efforts from FINRA and the SEC, industry participants continue to have no clear understanding of what qualifies a product as either “complex” or “risky.”  In this article, Chapman attorneys provide insight and context for a path forward for definitive guidance regarding complex products, but also for a more rational regulatory scheme that considers a wide variety of factors. This article proposes an objective framework for broker-dealers and investment advisers to consider Defined Outcome ETFs, regardless of whether they are deemed complex under the current regulatory environment, by utilizing a well-established measure of risk to assess whether an investment in those vehicles is in a client’s best interest.

On June 7, Governor Pritzker signed into law House Bill 4582, Public Act 103-0591 (the “Act”). Among other items, the Act amends the School Code, the Local Government Debt Reform Act (Debt Reform Act), and the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law (PTELL).

On June 5, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (the “Court”) determined to vacate rules recently adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) regulating the conduct of investment advisers to private investment funds (the “Private Fund Advisers Rule”).

On May 16, 2024, the IRS released Notice 2024-41 (the “Notice”), which provides updated guidance on the domestic content bonus energy credit available for qualifying energy projects under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the "IRA"). The Notice modifies existing guidance on the domestic content bonus under Notice 2023-38 (“Notice 2023-38”) and establishes a new elective safe harbor (the “New Elective Safe Harbor”) that allows project owners to determine certain projects’ eligibility for the domestic content bonus using predetermined cost percentages provided by the IRS.