Client Alerts & Publications Archive

According to recent IRS guidance, Tax Credit Seekers Have Until September 30, 2025, to "Acquire" Vehicles through a Binding Written Contract and either a nominal downpayment or a trade-In, to obtain a Section 45W Clean Commercial Vehicle Tax Credit.

On August 6, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission's Division of Trading and Markets
(the “Division”) issued responses to Frequently Asked Questions (“FAQs”) regarding rule amendments to Rule 15c3-3a under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Customer Protection Rule amendments”) related to the reserve calculations for clearing US Treasury securities (“Treasury Securities”). The Division’s FAQs provide guidance for broker-dealers as they prepare for the approaching compliance dates of December 31, 2026, and June 30, 2027, for mandatory central clearing of cash and repo transactions, respectively, in Treasury Securities.

IRS Notice 2025-42 provides that wind and solar facilities that start construction on or after September 2, 2025 may not rely on the 5% Safe Harbor to establish the beginning of construction date in determining whether an applicable wind or solar facility is subject to the accelerated placed-in-service requirement of Section 45Y and 48E tax credits under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, enacted on July 4, 2025 (the “OBBBA”). In addition, Notice 2025-42 provides an exception for “Low Output Solar Facilities” to continue to use the 5% Safe Harbor.

Elimination of the 5% Safe Harbor is most likely to affect wind and solar facilities that are not already subject to binding construction and procurement contracts, as developers of those facilities will be scrambling in the next few months to complete design, funding and other development work so that they can execute construction and procurement contracts and commence physical work as soon as possible and by July 4, 2026.

On July 30, 2025, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc., NYSE Arca, Inc. and the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (collectively, the “Exchanges”) each filed a proposed rule change with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) to amend their respective listing rules to include generic listing standards for shares of certain commodity-based exchange-traded products (“Commodity ETPs”) that satisfy specific requirements.

If adopted, a Commodity ETP meeting the requirements of the generic listing standards would be eligible for listing on an Exchange without the need to submit a separate Rule 19b-4 application to the Commission. This change would streamline the listing process and broaden the range of eligible products, including those that have previously experienced resistance and delays in approval by the Commission, such as Commodity ETPs holding crypto assets (“Crypto ETPs”).

In a flurry of pre-recess activity, Congress recently made headway on two pieces of legislation with significant impacts for the digital asset industry, the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act (the “GENIUS Act”), which passed both chambers of Congress and was signed into law by the President on July 18, 2025, and the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (the “CLARITY Act”), which has thus far only passed the House but builds upon components of earlier legislative efforts in both the House and Senate. Alongside, the House also passed the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act, which prohibits the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency, part of the President’s directives in Executive Order 14067. Separately, the federal banking regulators released joint guidance to their respective federally chartered institutions on how to engage in safekeeping of crypto assets.

These developments include codification of many industry best practices and signals the intention of this Congress and administration to establish legal predictability and comfort for crypto and digital asset industry participants as well as their closely adjacent traditional banking and financial services partners.

On July 4, 2025, President Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill (“OBBB”) into law. Under the OBBB, there is still a window of opportunity for solar and wind projects to receive tax credits under Sections 45Y and 48E and for projects to avoid complex provisions relating to restricted foreign entities.

Below is a summary of OBBB’s impact on these and certain other tax credits. Beginning construction as soon as possible for these projects may be critical for receipt of the tax credit.

On June 27, 2025, the three federal banking agencies released a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) that would “reduce the calibration” of the minimum enhanced supplementary leverage ratio (eSLR) requirement that applies to US GSIBs and their bank (insured depository institution) subsidiaries. The NPR is available here.

The licensing regime in Nevada for consumer lenders and in particular for internet-based programs has been complicated and confusing. The situation is being clarified by recent legislation.

On May 28, 2025, Nevada Governor Joe Lombardo signed Senate Bill 437 (“SB 437”), which makes key changes for qualifying “Internet consumer lenders” under the Nevada Installment Loan and Finance Act.

On May 28, 2025, Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 21/Senate Bill 867 into law (the “Act”), which amends Chapter 394 of the Texas Local Government Code, the Texas Housing Finance Corporations Act (the “HFC Statute”). The Act is effective immediately, although specific provisions provide additional time for compliance. 

Key provisions of the Act are summarized below. Chapman will issue further alerts detailing certain provisions and will continue to work with our industry colleagues to provide additional guidance and training materials.

On April 24, 2025, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”) withdrew its previously issued supervisory guidance for banks related to certain crypto-asset activities. This development marks the latest in a series of coordinated regulatory shifts by federal banking agencies toward a more innovation-supportive framework for digital asset activities, building on the recent action of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) in Interpretive Letter 1183.

On March 19, 2025, the staff of the Division of Investment Management (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) updated its Marketing Compliance Frequently Asked Questions (“March 2025 FAQs”) to provide no-action relief with respect to the presentation of extracted performance, as well as clarity on whether certain portfolio or investment characteristics constitute “performance” for purposes of Rule 206(4)-1 (the “Marketing Rule”) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”).   

On April 4, 2025, the Division of Corporation Finance (“Corp Fin”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued a statement (“Statement”) that the offer and sale of “Covered Stablecoins,” as defined by Corp Fin, does not involve the offer and sale of securities within the meaning of Section 2(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) or Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Accordingly, Corp Fin stated that “persons involved in the process of ‘minting’ (or creating) and redeeming Covered Stablecoins do not need to register those transactions with the SEC under the Securities Act or fall within one of the Securities Act’s exemption from registration.”

Changes are coming for health care organizations that are borrowers with respect to municipal securities. New data standards required under the Financial Data Transparency Act of 2022 (FDTA) could take effect as early as 2027. In the March/April 2025 issue of AHLA’s Health Law Connections, Chapman partners Mary Kimura and Hillary Phelps provide a summary of the FDTA and the joint standards proposed in August 2024, including reactions from municipal securities industry participants and a look ahead at the next stages of the rulemaking process. They also explore potential impacts of the new data standards on health care organizations and systems.

On March 7, 2025, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) issued Interpretive Letter 1183, which confirms that national banks may engage in certain crypto-assets activities and reverses the previous requirement that they first obtain a supervisory non-objection letter before engaging in such activities.

As reported in our recent series of Client Alerts, the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) and the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s (the “Treasury Department”) Financial Crimes Enforcement Network’s (“FinCEN”) related beneficial ownership information (“BOI”) reporting rules have been the subject of a multitude of lawsuits, injunctions and announcements.

The Digital Chamber released a new report: "Beyond Merit: How the SEC's Division of Investment Management Blocked Permissible Investments in Digital Assets." The report seeks to provide a workable framework to turn historical Division of Investment Management actions regarding digital assets into a path forward for the increased availability of digital assets in investment company products. Chapman's Rick Coyle and Morrison Warren assisted in the preparation.

The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) has released its 2025 Annual Performance Plan, outlining its strategic priorities, resource allocations, and regulatory focus for the fiscal year. This plan is built around three primary goals: ensuring a safe, sound, and resilient system of cooperative credit that safeguards consumers; enhancing financial well-being through access to equitable and affordable financial products and services; and optimizing organizational performance to effectively fulfill the NCUA’s mission. While the NCUA will remain centered on these primary goals, the shifts in federal administration in Washington, in particular among financial regulatory agencies, may signal potential changes to the NCUA priorities and this Plan.

On February 17, 2025, in light of the Supreme Court’s grant of a stay in the Texas Top Cop Shop case, the District Court stayed the nationwide preliminary injunction of the CTA issued in Smith v. U.S. Department of Treasury. As a result, the BOI reporting rules are now once again enforceable and in effect.

Chapman's quarterly Regulatory Update contains an overview of the latest regulatory actions, market happenings, and litigation and enforcement activity in the investment management space.

The US derivatives markets are renowned for their depth and innovation, drawing participants from across the globe. These markets have a long‑established history of trading futures contracts on US Treasury securities, US and non‑US stock indexes, and physical commodities, as well as listed options on these instruments. In recent years, new types of contracts based on novel asset classes and indices have emerged. Examples of these new asset classes include cryptocurrencies, volatility, environmental attributes, and macroeconomic indicators. In addition to listed contracts, over‑the‑counter (OTC) derivatives may be executed bilaterally and either submitted for clearing or maintained as bilateral transactions if they are not subject to mandatory clearing requirements.

On January 23, 2025, the Supreme Court granted a stay of the District Court’s nationwide injunction pending any further appeals. However, a different judge in the same District Court recently issued an order in a separate case (Smith v. U.S. Department of Treasury) which enjoined FinCEN from enforcing the CTA against the plaintiffs in the case and, notably, stayed the effective date of the BOI reporting rules.

Chapman’s Trusts and Estates practice leader, Rebecca Wallenfelsz, teams up with financial planner Michael Jankowske to break down key tax buckets and show how strategic diversification can support more tax‑efficient wealth planning.

On December 31, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that mattress company Serta Simmons Bedding, LLC (“Serta”) violated the “sacred right” of its lenders to ratable repayment by placing more than $1 billion of new super-priority debt that would have priority over its existing loans and offering to “purchase” or “exchange” only a portion of its existing indebtedness for such new indebtedness, The Fifth Circuit held that such an exchange was not a permitted “open market purchase” under the terms of the existing indebtedness. While still significant, this ruling underscores the importance of the language in existing and future debt instruments which could either facilitate or inhibit similar transactions involving “liability management” or “lender-on-lender violence”.

As reported in our recent series of Client Alerts, on December 3, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (the “District Court”) issued a nationwide preliminary injunction that temporarily blocked enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) and the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network’s (“FinCEN”) related beneficial ownership information (“BOI”) reporting rules. On December 23, 2024, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals (the “Court of Appeals”) granted the government’s motion to stay the District Court’s preliminary injunction pending its appeal of that injunction order. As a result of the Court of Appeal’s ruling, FinCEN extended the reporting deadline to January 13, 2025. 

As previously noted in our Client Alert, on December 3, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (the “District Court”) issued a nationwide preliminary injunction that temporarily blocked enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) and the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) related beneficial ownership information (“BOI”) reporting rules, and as noted in our most recent Client Alert, the government filed an emergency motion with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals (the “Court of Appeals”) to stay the District Court’s preliminary injunction pending its appeal of that injunction order.  

As discussed in our previous Client Alerts on December 9 and December 13, on December 3, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (the “District Court”) issued a nationwide preliminary injunction that temporarily blocks enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) and the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) related beneficial ownership information (“BOI”) reporting rules.

On December 3, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a nationwide preliminary injunction that temporarily blocks enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) and the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) related beneficial ownership information (“BOI”) reporting rules. On December 12, 2024, the government filed a motion to stay the preliminary injunction pending its appeal.

On December 3, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a nationwide preliminary injunction that temporarily blocks enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) and the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) related beneficial ownership information (“BOI”) reporting rules.

A well-trodden path for banks to achieve regulatory capital reductions by mitigating credit risk is through a synthetic securitization, either by issuing credit-linked notes (CLNs) or engaging in bespoke bilateral credit derivative transactions. These transactions—while complex to execute—offer the significant advantage of transferring risk on a large, diversified portfolio of obligors, allowing investors to evaluate credit risk on a statistical basis. This lessens the need for investor diligence at the level of individual obligations, which facilitates risk transfer on obligors for whom information might be limited or costly to digest.

The Division of Examinations of the Securities and Exchange Commission published its examination priorities for fiscal year 2025. The 2025 Exam Priorities reflect practices, products, and services the Division believes present heightened risks to investors and the U.S. capital markets.

There have been several recent notable enforcement actions, including continued enforcement by the SEC and CFTC against off-channel communications, as well as an SEC fraud settlement with Macquarie Investment Management Business Trust.

Chapman's quarterly Regulatory Update contains an overview of the latest regulatory actions, market happenings, and litigation and enforcement activity in the investment management space.

On September 12, 2024, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) adopted amendments to CFTC Regulation 4.7 (Reg. 4.7), a rule that provides exemptions from the broader compliance requirements under Part 4 of the CFTC regulations (Part 4) for registered commodity pool operators (CPOs) with respect to pools (4.7 pools) offered solely to “Qualified Eligible Persons” (QEPs) and registered commodity trading advisors (CTAs) that advise or manage commodity trading accounts of QEPs. The amendments (i) increase the financial thresholds in the “Portfolio Requirement” of the QEP definition and (ii) permit CPOs of fund of fund pools offered solely to QEPs to provide monthly account statements within 45 days of the month-end, rather than providing quarterly account statements within 30 days of the quarter-end. The CFTC chose not to adopt, at this time, the proposed minimum QEP disclosures.

On August 22, 2024, a proposed rule (the “Proposed Joint Rule”) mandated by the Financial Data Transparency Act of 2022 (the “FDTA”) and adopted by nine federal financial regulators, including the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” and, together with the other eight regulators, the “Covered Agencies”), was published in the Federal Register. 

Chapman's white paper provides a summary of the interval fund and tender offer fund structures, including their basic legal framework, their investment restrictions, how they are distributed and how they facilitate redemptions. It also provides a comparison of interval funds and tender offer funds, both to each other and to other types of investment companies.

The Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”), rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) pursuant thereto, and state laws governing the activities of investment advisers determine when persons engaged in the business of providing investment advice must or may register as an investment adviser with either the SEC or the relevant state authorities.

On June 27, 2024, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of the United States Trustee, who had objected to Purdue’s plan of reorganization that granted releases of third party claims to members of the Sackler family in exchange for their contribution of up to $6 billion to the Purdue bankruptcy estate. Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the majority, found that the type of relief being granted to the Sacklers (i.e., a blanket shield from all existing or potential liability relating to the opioid crisis) represented the kind of “discharge” only available to debtors who have “placed all their assets on the table.”

In a decision that should help restore investors’ faith in the protections afforded municipal bondholders under the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), on June 12, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (the “First Circuit” or the “Court”) held that the bondholders (the “Bondholders”) of certain Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) electric revenue bonds (the “Bonds”) have a non-recourse claim against PREPA’s estate in PREPA’s reorganization proceedings under Title III of the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act, 48 U.S.C. §§ 2161-78 (“PROMESA”), for the full principal amount of their outstanding Bonds, plus matured interest, of approximately $8.5 billion, and that the Bonds are secured by PREPA’s current and future Net Revenues.

Despite recent regulatory efforts from FINRA and the SEC, industry participants continue to have no clear understanding of what qualifies a product as either “complex” or “risky.”  In this article, Chapman attorneys provide insight and context for a path forward for definitive guidance regarding complex products, but also for a more rational regulatory scheme that considers a wide variety of factors. This article proposes an objective framework for broker-dealers and investment advisers to consider Defined Outcome ETFs, regardless of whether they are deemed complex under the current regulatory environment, by utilizing a well-established measure of risk to assess whether an investment in those vehicles is in a client’s best interest.

On June 7, Governor Pritzker signed into law House Bill 4582, Public Act 103-0591 (the “Act”). Among other items, the Act amends the School Code, the Local Government Debt Reform Act (Debt Reform Act), and the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law (PTELL).

On June 5, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (the “Court”) determined to vacate rules recently adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) regulating the conduct of investment advisers to private investment funds (the “Private Fund Advisers Rule”).

On May 16, 2024, the IRS released Notice 2024-41 (the “Notice”), which provides updated guidance on the domestic content bonus energy credit available for qualifying energy projects under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the "IRA"). The Notice modifies existing guidance on the domestic content bonus under Notice 2023-38 (“Notice 2023-38”) and establishes a new elective safe harbor (the “New Elective Safe Harbor”) that allows project owners to determine certain projects’ eligibility for the domestic content bonus using predetermined cost percentages provided by the IRS.  

On April 23, 2024, the Department of Labor (“DOL”) released its final investment advice fiduciary rule, titled the Retirement Security Rule (the “Final Rule”), which re-defines who is a fiduciary on account of providing investment advice to workplace retirement plans and individual retirement accounts (“IRAs”). In addition, the DOL released several amended DOL prohibited transaction exemptions that, together with the Final Rule, are “intended to protect the interests of retirement investors by requiring persons who are defined in the Final Rule as investment advice fiduciaries to adhere to stringent conduct standards and mitigate their conflicts of interest.” The Final Rule and the amended exemptions finalize the proposed investment advice fiduciary rule and proposed amendments to the prohibited transaction exemptions, which the DOL issued on October 31, 2023. The Final Rule narrows certain provisions in the proposed rule that some commentators and industry groups argued were overly broad. The Final Rule and the amended prohibited transaction exemptions will become effective on September 23, 2024, except that certain provisions in the amended exemptions will not be phased in until one year after such effective date.

Amidst an ever-changing US regulatory landscape, Israeli fintechs need to carefully consider their licensing obligations when offering their products to US consumers. Chapman partner Tobias Moon provides perspective on regulatory considerations associated with the credit products Israeli fintech companies are offering to US-based consumers in the US-Israel Legal Review, published by Israel Desks.

In February 2023, Perpetual US Services, LLC filed an application for exemptive relief with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that, if granted, would allow a mutual fund to create and operate an ETF share class alongside its mutual fund share classes. In the February 2024 issue of The Investment Lawyer, Chapman partners Rick Coyle, Barry Pershkow and Morrison Warren break down the history of the sought-after relief, the potential advantages to such a structure for mutual fund sponsors and shareholders, and share their insights into the SEC’s reluctance to grant such relief, while ultimately arguing that the approval of these applications is the proper step for the SEC to take.

Earlier this month, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) finalized a long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures by public companies and in public offerings. See here. The rule does not apply to public asset-backed securities (“ABS”) issuers and the SEC has stated that it will continue to review climate disclosures related to these issuers.

Earlier this month, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) finalized a long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures by public companies and in public offerings. See here. The SEC’s rule is already facing legal challenges, including a recent ruling that temporarily blocks the rule from taking effect.

In its 2024 Supervisory Priorities, the NCUA set out examination priorities based on activities that pose the highest risk to federally insured credit union members (referred to as “credit unions”) and that are responsive to the continuous stream of challenges facing credit unions in this current market. It should come as no surprise to anyone that liquidity risk is once again an examination priority for 2024, as the economic environment continues to be uncertain. This all follows on the heels of the Addendum to the Interagency Policy Statement on Funding and Liquidity Risk Management: Importance of Contingency Funding Plans issued in July 2023 (the “Addendum”), highlighting the importance of contingency funding plans as a crucial component of managing funding and liquidity risk. 

On November 27, 2023, the US Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted final Securities Act Rule 192 (“Final Rule 192”) prohibiting certain conflicts of interest in securitization transactions. In general, Final Rule 192 prohibits a “securitization participant” with respect to an “asset-backed security” (“ABS”) from directly or indirectly engaging in any “conflicted transaction” during the applicable prohibition period.