Overview

Chapman is at the vanguard of the emerging cryptocurrency, digital asset, and blockchain industry. Our attorneys have an unparalleled command of the unique and complex issues surrounding investments and other transactions in this emerging asset class.

Chapman's century of experience as a law firm focused on finance uniquely positions our firm to provide clients with comprehensive advice and deep insight into the developing ecosystem of cryptocurrency, digital assets, and blockchain technology. We understand the evolving needs of the participants in this space and combine creative legal acumen with business and market insight. As this space has matured, so have the diversity, breadth, and depth of our representation.

Chapman attorneys advise clients across legal products, including regulatory, corporate, investment management, tax, and litigation matters, and across borders on multi-jurisdictional mandates. We also maintain close relationships with leading trade organizations, such as the Chamber of Digital Commerce, that represent the industry before regulatory bodies and local and federal governmental bodies, including the US Congress and Securities and Exchange Commission.

Fund Formation and Investing

  • Formation and structuring of ETFs and other 1940 Act-registered investment fund structures, including preparing registration statements and facilitating SEC review process

  • Organization of private investment funds, including hedge funds and venture funds

  • Preparation of private fund documents such as private placement memorandums, limited partnership agreements, trust agreements, escrow agreements, subscription booklets, and investment management agreements

  • Advising on 19b-4 exchange listing applications for publicly traded digital asset investment funds

  • Negotiating side letters with private fund investors and arrangements with administrators and other service providers

  • Negotiating cryptocurrency custody agreements and derivatives trading documentation
  • Advising institutional investors on due diligence considerations associated with investments in private funds investing in digital assets
  • Guidance through evolving regulatory and enforcement landscape, including proceedings and investigations involving federal and state regulatory and law enforcement authorities (Department of Justice, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and various self regulatory organizations, including FINRA, NFA, and national securities exchanges)
  • Risk management and compliance guidance regarding custody, AML, MNPI, registration, and other digital asset enforcement priorities, including developing bespoke compliance manuals, policies, and procedures

SEC, CFTC, and Other Regulations

  • Counseling on SEC, CFTC, and other regulations applicable to asset managers, issuers of virtual currencies and tokens, foundations, DAOs, and other entities operating in the crypto and blockchain space
  • Analysis of whether coins, tokens and other digital assets may be classified as securities or commodities, and the implications of any applicable regulatory frameworks
  • Advising on issues related to both centrally cleared and over-the-counter cryptocurrency derivatives
  • Considerations related to the formation of DAOs, initial coin offerings and other token disbursement programs

Tax Planning and Structuring

  • Evaluating the treatment of cryptocurrencies and derivatives on cryptocurrencies under rules applicable to repurchase and lending transactions, straddles, wash sales, constructive sales, mandatory and elective mark- to-market recognition of gains and losses
  • Evaluating tax consequences of cryptocurrency investments to different taxpayers in light of IRS guidance that cryptocurrencies are "property" and applicable tax treatment of air drops, staking, lending, other DeFi activities, including grantor trust and publicly traded partnership issues
  • Determining whether a fund is engaged in a US-trade or business and evaluating the application of safe harbor rules to various cryptocurrencies

Corporate and M&A Practice

  • Advising clients on public market mergers and acquisitions with and of crypto and blockchain companies
  • Guidance on infrastructure partnership and commercial arrangements with organizations that mint and issue digital assets
  • Assistance with entity formation, financings, and joint ventures for companies creating and developing digital assets
  • Advising on the integration of digital assets into advertising, marketing, and other consumer-facing activities and related legal considerations


Transaction Highlights

  • Representing the first to market spot litecoin and hedera ETFs
  • Representing the first to market solana staking ETF
  • Representing three of the first to market spot bitcoin ETFs
  • Representing the first to market blockchain ETF
  • Representing the second to market bitcoin futures ETF
  • Advise 1933 Act exchange-traded products on new and novel structures to advance digital asset strategies
  • Represented the sponsors of privately offered single- and multi-digital asset trusts that offer exposure to various cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Polkadot (DOT), Avalanche (AVA), TRON (TRX), Algorand (ALGO), and HBAR, among others, as well as those pursuing a "staking" strategy
  • Advise privately offered trusts holding cryptocurrencies and other digital assets seeking to "uplist" their shares to OTCQX
  • Advise registered investment advisers offering private funds that engage in stablecoin lending to large cryptocurrency exchanges
  • Co-counsel to an institutional cryptocurrency wallet and custody platform in the sale of its institutional bitcoin custody business
  • Represented a financial services firm that serves as a third-party key agent for digital asset/crypto-collateralized loans, including bitcoin- and ether-backed loans, originated by a decentralized platform operated by a financial technology company
  • Represented a cryptocurrency firm in establishing a lending program based upon and backed by cryptocurrency accounts
  • Represented digital asset custodians on regulatory and contract matters
  • Represented a member of a stablecoin consortium project on regulatory and contractual matters
  • Represented sponsors and advisers of registered and private investment vehicles on formation, securities law, and commodities issues, as well as ongoing compliance and best practices
  • Represented digital asset lending platforms on regulatory matters
  • Represented participants on a blockchain-based loan purchase platform
  • Advised a servicing agent on regulatory and contract issues relating to participating in a digital asset lending platform
  • Advised a data platform on regulatory and operational issues

Concentrations

Related Practices

People

Practice Leader

Insights

Cryptocurrency, Digital Assets, and Blockchain Updates

  • Chapman Insights

    Read the latest edition of On-Chain Spotlight for key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Chapman Insights

    Read the latest edition of On-Chain Spotlight for key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Chapman Insights

    Read the latest edition of On-Chain Spotlight for key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Chapman Insights

    Read the latest edition of On-Chain Spotlight for key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Chapman Insights

    Read the latest edition of On-Chain Spotlight for key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Chapman Insights

    Read the latest edition of On-Chain Spotlight for key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Chapman Insights

    Read the latest edition of On-Chain Spotlight for key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Chapman Insights

    Read the latest edition of On-Chain Spotlight for key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Chapman Insights

    Read the latest edition of On-Chain Spotlight for key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Chapman Insights

    Read the latest edition of On-Chain Spotlight for key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Client Alert

    On April 13, 2026, the Staff of the SEC’s Division of Trading and Markets issued a statement (“Statement”) setting out its views on when a person that creates, offers, and/or operates certain user interfaces used to prepare transactions in crypto asset securities (a “Covered User Interface Provider”) may do so without registering as a broker-dealer under Section 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Statement is the latest in a series of federal regulatory developments aimed at reconciling crypto industry practices within the existing securities and derivatives regulatory framework, following the SEC and CFTC’s joint guidance on the status of certain crypto assets and the CFTC’s recent no-action relief for a crypto wallet technology vendor. Commissioner Hester M. Peirce issued a separate statement commending the Staff but calling for a more permanent approach.

  • News

    Chapman welcomes partner Cris Cicala to our Asset Securitization and Structured Finance Group; Cryptocurrency, Digital Assets, and Blockchain Group; and Compliance, Regulatory and Payments Group. Cris has an extensive digital assets practice advising funds, financial institutions, fintech companies, and digital-native market participants in matters involving digital assets and blockchain. He also has particularly deep experience in representing Latin American and European financial institutions and their US branches in both US domestic and cross-border transactions.

  • Chapman Insights

    Read the latest edition of On-Chain Spotlight for key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Chapman Insights

    Read the latest edition of On-Chain Spotlight for key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Chapman Insights

    Read the latest edition of On-Chain Spotlight for key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Chapman Insights

    Read the latest edition of On-Chain Spotlight for key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Article
    Practical Law

    Chapman partners Juan Arciniegas, Curtis Doty, Peter Hong, and Morrison Warren co-authored an article published by Thomson Reuters / Practical Law, providing essential guidance on the rapidly evolving landscape of cryptocurrency. As digital assets continue their march into mainstream finance, a new generation of investment products is reshaping how institutions and individuals gain exposure. Navigating this space requires understanding critical distinctions that carry real consequences for performance, costs, and compliance.

  • Client Alert

    On January 28, 2026, the SEC Staff (the “Staff”) from the Division of Corporation Finance, the Division of Investment Management, and the Division of Trading and Markets issued a joint statement on tokenized securities. The statement builds upon and expands Commissioner Peirce’s July 2025 remarks, “Enchanting, but Not Magical,” emphasizing that innovations in tokenization should be approached as a process of regulated evolution. The statement provides the Staff’s views on tokenized versions of securities that are issued as crypto-assets and recorded on a distributed ledger technology (DLT), such as a blockchain network.

  • Chapman Insights

    Read our synopsis of key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the blockchain and digital assets industry.

  • Client Alert

    On December 8, 2025, the Market Participants Division, Division of Market Oversight, and Division of Clearing and Risk (collectively, “Divisions”) of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) issued guidance on the use of tokenized assets as collateral in the trading of futures and swaps. The Guidance follows a September 2025 request for comment on the use of tokenized collateral in derivatives markets, including on the recommendations made in a November 2024 report of the CFTC’s Global Markets Advisory Committee (“GMAC”).

    Consistent with the GMAC’s recommendations, the Guidance acknowledges that CFTC regulations do not require any particular technology or operational infrastructure to transfer or hold eligible collateral, stating instead that “assets retain their margin eligibility so long as they satisfy applicable regulatory requirements”. The Guidance largely reiterates existing regulations without adding tokenization-specific standards. Nonetheless, the Guidance is significant because it reflects the Divisions’ concurrence with the GMAC’s conclusion that no changes to CFTC regulations are needed, and it identifies areas where
    risk-focused analysis is expected.

    This bulletin highlights certain key points in the Guidance, focusing on issues raised by the unique attributes of tokenization and considerations relevant to swap dealers subject to CFTC uncleared margin regulations.

  • Video
    Amid growing regulatory activity and accelerating industry adoption, Chapman hosted a cross‑industry panel exploring the growing role of tokenization in financial markets, examining how the technology is advancing, what risks and opportunities it presents, and what market participants should be preparing for next.
  • Client Alert

    On November 10, 2025, the IRS issued Revenue Procedure 2025-31, providing formal guidance addressing how trusts that qualify as investment trusts under Treas. Reg. § 301.7701-4(c) and grantor trusts for Federal income tax purposes can engage in digital asset staking without jeopardizing their favorable tax treatment. This guidance clarifies the conditions under which staking activities may be conducted while maintaining classification as both an investment trust and a grantor trust. The procedure establishes a safe harbor with detailed structural and operational requirements for eligible trusts, providing greater certainty for trustees and beneficiaries navigating digital asset investments. In particular, the safe harbor provides sponsors of trusts operating as crypto asset exchange-traded products (“ETPs”) a grantor trust compliant path to timely meet redemption requests in circumstances when the “unstaking” of a staked digital asset takes longer than the trust’s normal T+1 settlement cycle for redemptions.

  • News

    Chapman welcomes partner Christian Brockman to our Corporate and Securities Department and Investment Management Group. A leader at the intersection of finance and technology, Christian brings a unique commercial perspective from his experience as general counsel to guide private fund sponsors and institutional investors through their most complex transactional and regulatory matters, with a particular focus on the digital asset and cryptocurrency ecosystem.

  • Report

    The Digital Chamber released a new report: "Beyond Merit: How the SEC's Division of Investment Management Blocked Permissible Investments in Digital Assets." The report seeks to provide a workable framework to turn historical Division of Investment Management actions regarding digital assets into a path forward for the increased availability of digital assets in investment company products. Chapman's Rick Coyle and Morrison Warren assisted in the preparation.

  • Client Alert

    Chapman's quarterly Regulatory Update contains an overview of the latest regulatory actions, market happenings, and litigation and enforcement activity in the investment management space.

  • Client Alert

    Chapman's quarterly Regulatory Update contains an overview of the latest regulatory actions, market happenings, and litigation and enforcement activity in the investment management space.

  • Client Alert

    At a time when the digital asset market is badly in need of good news, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) has delivered the long-awaited ISDA Digital Asset Derivatives Definitions (the “Definitions”).

  • Report

    Chapman represented the Chamber of Digital Commerce in connection with its “Spot Bitcoin ETF Initiative” which set out to gain a deep understanding of the industry’s experience in pursuit of a registered Spot Bitcoin ETF and provide insight into the most realistic avenues for ultimately getting the SEC to approve this widely anticipated investment product.

Engagements

News and Events

June 22, 2026

On-Chain Spotlight

Read our synopsis of key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the blockchain and digital assets industry:

Regulatory Developments

  • June 18: FinCEN, alongside major federal regulators, has proposed a rule requiring permitted payment stablecoin issuers to implement customer identification programs under the GENIUS Act, treating them as financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act. The measure aims to mitigate illicit finance risks and ensure stablecoin issuers meet anti-money laundering requirements, with public comments invited for 60 days – read the announcement here.

  • June 17: Illinois has enacted a law imposing a 0.2% tax on customers' use of digital asset services including exchange, transfer, and custody for firms serving Illinois residents with at least $100,000 in gross receipts. The tax will become effective January 1, 2027 – read the legislation here.

  • June 17: House and Senate leaders reached a compromise on sweeping housing legislation (H.R. 6644) that includes language barring the Federal Reserve from issuing or creating a U.S. CBDC through December 31, 2030 and explicitly specifies that the bar does not include permissionless private dollar assets such as stablecoins that preserve cash-like privacy protections – read the announcement here.

  • June 16: The CFTC issued a Request for Information seeking input on regulations or guidance that may hinder FinTechs from partnering with federally regulated institutions, aiming to update or streamline existing requirements and encourage innovation and competition in financial services. The comment period will be open until July 9, 2026 – read the press release here.

  • June 12: FinCEN issued guidance clarifying that banks can share real-time fraud alerts and a wide array of sensitive information with each other under the USA Patriot Act's Section 314(b) safe harbor, expanding prior interpretations to include many types of fraud and providing legal protection for collaborative efforts to fight scams and money laundering – read the fact sheet here.

  • June 11: The SEC proposed rescinding Regulation NMS provisions Rule 611's "trade-through" protection and Rule 610(e)'s ban on "locked/crossed" quotes, potentially removing major market-structure obstacles that make onchain trading of tokenized U.S. stocks via automated market makers difficult or noncompliant today. The proposal is open for a 60-day comment period and, if adopted, could shift the regulatory framework toward a more principles-based execution – read the announcement here.

Market Developments

  • June 18: Pending SEC approval, Franklin Templeton has proposed two new ETFs that seek to automatically reinvest corporate dividends into bitcoin, creating a steady allocation of 5% BTC alongside 95% U.S. equities – read the filing here.

  • June 17: Moody's is embedding its credit ratings directly into tokenized bonds and fixed-income securities on Solana, following a partnership with Alphaledger that expands its blockchain rating system beyond its earlier Canton Network deployment. This move is intended to make credit assessments more accessible to investors and support broader institutional adoption of tokenized assets – read the announcement here.

  • June 17: U.K. neobank Plasma launched Plasma One, a flagship app that integrates spending, sending, and earning with stablecoins. Plasma aims to make stablecoins function as fiat currency, offering instant, global transactions and yield opportunities – read more in this article.

  • June 17: Fidelity Investments launched the Fidelity Reserves Digital Fund, a money market fund for stablecoin issuers and institutions, aligning with reserve requirements under the new GENIUS Act and joining State Street in targeting this fast-growing market – read more about the State Street fund in this article and read the Fidelity fund overview here.

  • June 17: Zama, Morpho, and Steakhouse Financial launched the Steakhouse Confidential USDC Prime vault on Ethereum, enabling institutions to earn DeFi yield on encrypted USDC balances without exposing positions, amounts, or strategies publicly onchain. The vault opens for deposits June 23, marking a significant advance in privacy-focused DeFi yield products for institutional investors – read more on the Morpho site.

  • June 16: Coinbase announced plans for the first 1:1 backed tokenized U.S. stocks, allowing users to buy, trade, and hold onchain shares with automatic dividend payments, marking a major step toward real-time, blockchain-based equity investing – read the announcement here.

  • June 16: BlackRock launched the iShares Bitcoin Premium Income ETF (BITA), which pairs spot bitcoin exposure with a partial covered-call strategy to generate monthly option-premium distributions – read the ETF overview here.

  • June 16: State Street launched SSCXX, a GENIUS Act–compliant money market fund designed to provide stablecoin issuers with secure, yield-earning and regulated reserves, supporting large-scale stablecoin issuance and institutional adoption – read the announcement here.

  • June 12: Exodus launched "Exodus Markets" with Ondo Finance on June 12, enabling eligible users to trade 200+ tokenized stocks, ETFs and other real-world assets directly on Solana through its self-custodial wallet – read the announcement here.

  • June 11: Early Warning Services, LLC, the operator of Zelle, unveiled ZelleUSD, a proprietary dollar-backed stablecoin to support future cross-border payments – read the press release here.

  • June 11: Coinbase now processes nearly $1 trillion in annual stablecoin transactions and holds about $20 billion in USDC, and has had 160 million agentic payments powered by their x402 protocol – read more in this article.

Litigation, Enforcement, and Examination Developments

  • June 18: CME CEO Terrence Duffy announced plans to sue the CFTC after the agency approved Kalshi's perpetual futures product, arguing it does not meet the Dodd-Frank Act's definition of a "swap" and should not have been approved as a future. The CFTC responded by defending its decision and labeling CME's legal challenge as resistance to proinnovation policies and competition – read Duffy's statement here and CFTC chair Michael Selig's statement here.

  • June 18: Alexander Mashinsky, former CEO of Celsius, is permanently banned by the CFTC from commodities industry activity, following his conviction and imprisonment for fraud related to misleading customers about Celsius's financial health – read the press release here.

  • June 17: A federal judge in Michigan denied Polymarket and Robinhood's request to block state enforcement against their sports prediction markets, ruling that these contracts are not financial derivatives. On June 12, the CFTC sued New Mexico officials to block enforcement of state gaming laws against Kalshi's sports prediction markets and on June 18, Kentucky filed suit against the Kashi and Polymarket. These latest rulings highlight the ongoing legal uncertainty, likely setting up a future Supreme Court review – read about the Michigan case here, the Kentucky case here, and the CFTC's suit against New Mexico here.

  • June 12: A federal appeals court rejected Sam Bankman-Fried's bid to overturn his FTX fraud conviction and 25-year sentence, finding prosecutors' evidence "robust" and concluding customers were defrauded once their funds were transferred to Alameda regardless of any intent to repay – read the appeal opinion here.

  • June 11: Federal prosecutors unsealed charges against two men accused of running "AudiA6," a cryptocurrency laundering service that allegedly processed more than $389 million since 2021 and advertised on the Dark2Web cybercrime forum. The defendants were arrested in Georgia and face U.S. money-laundering charges as part of a multinational enforcement operation that included seizures, asset freezes, and takedowns of related online infrastructure – read the US Attorney's office's announcement here.

Download a PDF of this newsletter.
  Join our Blockchain and Digital Assets mailing list.  

White button that says Subscribe.


 
Upcoming

Connect with our attorneys at these industry events.

 
 
Blue graphic that says Sponsor ETFGI Global ETFs Insights Summit September 29 New York, NY
 
 
Blue graphic that says Sponsor Fordham Law Blockchain Regulatory Symposium October 5 New York, NY
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Past Editions

June

Download a PDF of the June 15, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the June 8, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the June 2, 2026 edition.


May

Download a PDF of the May 26, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the May 18, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the May 11, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the May 4, 2026 edition.

April

Download a PDF of the April 27, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the April 20, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the April 13, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the April 7, 2026 edition.

March

Download a PDF of the March 30, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the March 26, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the March 16, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the March 6, 2026 edition.

February

Download a PDF of the February 27, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the February 20, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the February 13, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the February 6, 2026 edition.

January

Download a PDF of the January 23, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the January 16, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the January 9, 2026 edition.


   

Join our Blockchain and Digital Assets mailing list.

Blue button that says Subscribe

GENIUS Act Tracker

As of June 22, 2026

Jump to: GENIUS Act Rulemaking Timeline  |  GENIUS Act Reporting Requirements


Download a PDF of this page.


The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act (the “GENIUS Act”) enacted in July 2025 instructs the prudential bank regulators and the U.S. Treasury to promulgate regulations, and coordinate as appropriate, implementing the GENIUS Act. Majority of the implementation final rules must be promulgated are within one year of the statute’s effective date, and GENIUS Act officially takes effect on the earlier of January 18, 2027, or 120 days after final rules are issued. The timeline to promulgate each regulation is set out below along with updates on the status of the notice and comment processes that each of the FDIC, the Federal Reserve, OCC, NCUA, and the Department of the Treasury (FinCEN/OFAC) have initiated to comply with the rulemaking requirements set out in the GENIUS Act.

GENIUS Act Rulemaking Timeline

Required Rulemaking Responsible Regulator Timeline to Promulgate Required Regulation Status GENIUS Act Section
Issuance and treatment of payment stablecoins Treasury Secretary July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on GENIUS Act Implementation issued by the Department of Treasury on September 18, 2025; as published in the Federal Register on September 19, 2025 (“Treasury ANPRM”). Comment period closed November 4, 2025. §§3(c)-(d)
12 U.S.C. § 5902
Capital, liquidity, risk management, amendments to capital requirements

FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, NCUA, and any applicable State Payment Stablecoin Regulator

July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment)

Implementing the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act for the Issuance of Stablecoins by Entities Subject to the Jurisdiction of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued on February 25, 2026; as published in the Federal Register on March 2, 2026 (“OCC Implementation NPRM”). Comment period closes May 1, 2026.

GENIUS Act Requirements and Standards for FDIC‑Supervised Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuers and Insured Depository Institutions issued on April 7, 2026; as published in the Federal Register on April 10, 2026 (“FDIC Implementation NPRM”).

Implementing the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act for the Issuance of Stablecoins by Entities Subject to the Jurisdiction of the National Credit Union Administration; as published in the Federal Register on May 18, 2026 ("NCUA Implementation NPRM"). Comment period closes July 17, 2026.

§ 4(a)(4)
12 U.S.C. § 5903(a)(4)
PPSI BSA and Economic Sanctions Compliance Standards

FDIC

July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment)

Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions Compliance Standards for FDIC-Supervised Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuers on May 22, 2026; as published in the Federal Register on June 06, 2026 (“FDIC Comment Request”). Comment period closes August 04, 2026.

§ 4(a)(4)(A)(iv) of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iv))
Rules applying BSA/AML and sanctions obligations to permitted payment stablecoin issuers Treasury Secretary Presumed—July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) deadline may apply Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuer Anti‑Money Laundering/Countering the Financing of Terrorism Program and Sanctions Compliance Program Requirements issued on April 8, 2026; as published in the Federal Register on April 10, 2026 (“Treasury AML NPRM”). Comment period closes June 9, 2026.

§ 4(a)(5)(B)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(a)(5)(B)

PPSI Customer Identification Program (“CIP”) Requirements

FinCEN, jointly with OCC, Federal Reserve, FDIC, NCUA

[TBD]

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuer Customer Identification Program issued on June 18, 2026; as published in the Federal Register on June 22, 2026 (“PPSI Customer Identification Program NPRM”). Comment period closes August 21, 2026.

§ 4(a)(5)(A)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(a)(5)(A)

General regulations for financial stability and implementation of the principal requirements of § 4(a) OCC, in coordination with other relevant payment stablecoin regulators July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) OCC Implementation NPRM

§ 4(b)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(b)
General regulations for implementation of and compliance with the principal requirements of § 4(a)

FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, NCUA, and any applicable State Payment Stablecoin Regulator

July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment)

OCC Implementation NPRM

FDIC Implementation NPRM

NCUA Implementation NPRM

§ 4(h)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(h)
Processes for applications by, and regulation and supervision of, Federal‑qualified payment stablecoin issuers

FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA

July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment)

OCC Implementation NPRM

FDIC Implementation NPRM

Investments in and Licensing of Permitted Payment Stablecoins Issuers issued on February 11, 2026; as published in the Federal Register on February 12, 2026 (“NCUA Licensing NPRM”). Comment period closed April 13, 2026.

Approval Requirements for Issuance of Payment Stablecoins by Subsidiaries of FDIC‑Supervised Insured Depository Institutions issued on December 16, 2025; as published in the Federal Register on December 19, 2025 (“FDIC Licensing NPRM”). Comment period extended from February 17, 2026 to May 18, 2026.

§ 5(a)(2)(A)

12 U.S.C. § 5904(a)(2)
Regulation of payment stablecoin issuance FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment)

OCC Implementation NPRM

FDIC Implementation NPRM

NCUA Implementation NPRM

NCUA Licensing NPRM

FDIC Licensing NPRM

§ 5(g)

12 U.S.C. § 5904(g)

Federal Reserve backup enforcement authority against State‑qualified permitted payment stablecoin issuers in unusual and exigent circumstances

Federal Reserve July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Pending

§ 7(e)(1)(B)

12 U.S.C. § 5906(e)(2)

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency backup enforcement authority against State‑qualified permitted payment stablecoin issuers that are nonbanks in unusual and exigent circumstances

OCC July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) OCC Implementation NPRM

§ 7(e)(1)(B)

12 U.S.C. § 5906(e)(2)
Criteria regarding resumption of compliance by a foreign payment stablecoin issuer Treasury Secretary July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Treasury ANPRM

§ 8(b)(3)(B)

12 U.S.C. § 5907(b)(3)(B)
Standards for registration requests and appeals process of foreign payment stablecoin issuers OCC July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) OCC Implementation NPRM

§ 18(c)(1)(E)

12 U.S.C. § 5916(c)(1)(E)
Rules implementing the anti‑tying provision and permitting exceptions Federal Reserve, in consultation with the FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA as related to exceptions to the anti‑tying provision No deadline—regulators “may” issue such orders Pending

§ 4(a)(8)(B)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(a)(8)(B)
Rules clarifying the application of ownership limitations, including restrictions on payment stablecoin issuance by U.S. public companies and companies not domiciled in the United States that are “not predominantly engaged” in financial activities Stablecoin Certification Review Committee (Treasury Secretary, Federal Reserve Chair, and FDIC Chair) July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Pending

§ 4(a)(12)(D)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(a)(12)
Principles for assessment of whether state regulatory frameworks are “substantially similar” to federal frameworks Treasury Secretary Presumed—July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) deadline may apply GENIUS Act Broad‑Based Principles for Determining Whether a State‑Level Regulatory Regime Is Substantially Similar to the Federal Regulatory Framework issued on April 1, 2026; as published in the Federal Register on April 3, 2026 (“Treasury Substantially Similar NPRM”). Comment period closes June 2, 2026.

§ 4(c)(2)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(c)(2)

Certifications from state payment stablecoin regulators that the state‑level regulatory regime satisfies applicable criteria and is “substantially similar” to the federal framework, and annual recertifications of the accuracy of the initial certification

State Payment Stablecoin Regulator July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Pending

§ 4(c)(4)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(c)(4)

Established process for expedited review of state regimes for substantial similarity to the federal regime if the state has a prudential regulatory regime in effect by January 14, 2026

Stablecoin Certification Review Committee (Treasury Secretary, Federal Reserve Chair, and FDIC Chair) Responsible regulator shall endeavor for the process must be in effect by January 14, 2026 to enable expedited review Pending

§ 4(c)(7)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(c)(7)
State‑level requirements for state‑qualified payment stablecoin issuers may be issued to the same extent as federal regulations State Payment Stablecoin Regulator No deadline—regulators “may” issue such orders Pending

§ 7(d)

12 U.S.C. § 5906(d)
Public comment on anti‑money laundering innovation Treasury Secretary Beginning August 17, 2025 for a period of 60 days

Treasury ANPRM

Treasury Issues Request for Comment Related to the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act issued on August 18, 2025; comment period closed October 17, 2025 (“Treasury Illicit Finance RFC”).

§ 9(a)

12 U.S.C. § 5908(a)
Rulemaking to mitigate illicit financial activity FinCEN July 18, 2028 (three years after enactment) Pending

§ 9(d)

12 U.S.C. § 5908(a)
Prescribe terms and conditions under which exceptions to custody requirements apply FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA No deadline—regulators “may” issue such orders Pending

§ 10(c)(2)(C)

12 U.S.C. § 5909(c)(2)(C)
Assessment of the necessity of interoperability standards among permitted payment stablecoin issuers and the broader digital finance ecosystem FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA, in consultation with NIST Unclear—July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) deadline may apply Pending

§ 12

12 U.S.C. § 5912
Review of existing regulations applicable to regulated entities

FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA

Unclear—July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) deadline may apply

Pending

NCUA Implementation NPRM

§ 16(b)

12 U.S.C. § 5915(b)
Issuance of rules that may be required to regulate foreign payment stablecoin issuers offering and selling payment stablecoins in the United States Treasury Secretary July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Treasury ANPRM

§ 18(b)(6)

12 U.S.C. § 5916(b)(6)
Creation and implementation of reciprocal arrangements or bilateral agreements between the U.S. and comparable payment stablecoin regulatory regimes Treasury Secretary July 18, 2027 (two years after enactment) Treasury ANPRM

§ 18(d)(3)

12 U.S.C. § 5916(d)(3)

GENIUS Act Reporting Requirements

In addition to the rulemaking activity summarized above, the GENIUS Act requires the primary federal payment stablecoin regulators, including the FDIC, NCUA, Federal Reserve and OCC for banks and the OCC for non-bank and state-supervised PPSIs, the Treasury Secretary and/or the Attorney General, to produce reports for the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate; the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives; or the Director of the Office of Financial Research, as summarized below.

Required Reports Responsible Regulator Due Date Status GENIUS Act Section
Justification for the determination of Unusual and Exigent Circumstances in approving safe harbors Treasury Secretary Prior to issuing such safe harbor Pending

§ 3(c)

12 U.S.C. § 5902
National security coordination with permitted payment stablecoin issuers Attorney General and Treasury Secretary July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Pending

§ 4(a)(6)(C)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(a)(6)(C)

Notification to Congress upon beginning the processing of applications from prospective permitted payment stablecoin issuers

FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA As‑needed Pending

§ 5(e)

12 U.S.C. § 5904(e)

Annual reports to Congress on applications from prospective permitted payment stablecoin issuers that have been pending for at least 180 days

FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA Annually Pending

§ 5(e)

12 U.S.C. § 5904(e)
Reports regarding secondary trading of a payment stablecoin issued by a foreign payment stablecoin issuer Treasury Secretary As‑needed within seven days after the applicable waiver or license is issued Pending

§ 8(c)(4)

12 U.S.C. § 5907(c)(4)
Report addressing illicit finance‑related recommendations, including detection, risk assessment, and legislative recommendations Treasury Secretary January 14, 2026 (180 days after enactment) Report to Congress from the Secretary of the Treasury on Innovative Technologies to Counter Illicit Finance Involving Digital Assets (March 2026)

§ 9(e)

12 U.S.C. § 5908(e)
Report providing findings of a study regarding insolvency proceedings of permitted payment stablecoin issuers FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA July 18, 2028 (three years after enactment) Pending

§ 11(h)

12 U.S.C. § 5910
Report confirming and describing regulations issued to carry out the GENIUS Act Federal Banking Agencies (FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC) January 14, 2026 (180 days after enactment) Pending

§ 13(c)

12 U.S.C. § 5913(c)
Report providing findings of a study of non‑payment stablecoins, including endogenously collateralized stablecoins Treasury Secretary July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Pending

§ 14(a)(2)

12 U.S.C. § 5914(a)(2)
Report providing information on the status of the payment stablecoin industry, including trends, applications for permitted payment stablecoin issuer status, and potential financial stability risks FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, NCUA, and any applicable State Payment Stablecoin Regulator July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Pending

§ 15(a)

12 U.S.C. § 5914(a)
Incorporation of the above report into its annual report to Congress pursuant to the Dodd‑Frank Act Financial Stability Oversight Council

Annually, beginning July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment)

Pending

§ 15(b)

12 U.S.C. § 5914(b)

We have always been focused on finance.

  • 1913
    TS Chapman partners with Henry Cutler to form Chapman and Cutler
  • 1st
    Chapman's first client in 1913 is still a client of the firm today
  • 22
    Diverse financial practices serving regional, national, and global clients
  • 6
    Offices across the country and in key US financial centers

Chapman and Cutler LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Strictly Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions. Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. When using a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages. These do not store any personal information.

Marketing Cookies

Marketing cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek