Overview

Chapman is at the vanguard of the emerging cryptocurrency, digital asset, and blockchain industry. Our attorneys have an unparalleled command of the unique and complex issues surrounding investments and other transactions in this emerging asset class.

Chapman's century of experience as a law firm focused on finance uniquely positions our firm to provide clients with comprehensive advice and deep insight into the developing ecosystem of cryptocurrency, digital assets, and blockchain technology. We understand the evolving needs of the participants in this space and combine creative legal acumen with business and market insight. As this space has matured, so have the diversity, breadth, and depth of our representation.

Chapman attorneys advise clients across legal products, including regulatory, corporate, investment management, tax, and litigation matters, and across borders on multi-jurisdictional mandates. We also maintain close relationships with leading trade organizations, such as the Chamber of Digital Commerce, that represent the industry before regulatory bodies and local and federal governmental bodies, including the US Congress and Securities and Exchange Commission.

Fund Formation and Investing

  • Formation and structuring of ETFs and other 1940 Act-registered investment fund structures, including preparing registration statements and facilitating SEC review process

  • Organization of private investment funds, including hedge funds and venture funds

  • Preparation of private fund documents such as private placement memorandums, limited partnership agreements, trust agreements, escrow agreements, subscription booklets, and investment management agreements

  • Advising on 19b-4 exchange listing applications for publicly traded digital asset investment funds

  • Negotiating side letters with private fund investors and arrangements with administrators and other service providers

  • Negotiating cryptocurrency custody agreements and derivatives trading documentation
  • Advising institutional investors on due diligence considerations associated with investments in private funds investing in digital assets
  • Guidance through evolving regulatory and enforcement landscape, including proceedings and investigations involving federal and state regulatory and law enforcement authorities (Department of Justice, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and various self regulatory organizations, including FINRA, NFA, and national securities exchanges)
  • Risk management and compliance guidance regarding custody, AML, MNPI, registration, and other digital asset enforcement priorities, including developing bespoke compliance manuals, policies, and procedures

SEC, CFTC, and Other Regulations

  • Counseling on SEC, CFTC, and other regulations applicable to asset managers, issuers of virtual currencies and tokens, foundations, DAOs, and other entities operating in the crypto and blockchain space
  • Analysis of whether coins, tokens and other digital assets may be classified as securities or commodities, and the implications of any applicable regulatory frameworks
  • Advising on issues related to both centrally cleared and over-the-counter cryptocurrency derivatives
  • Considerations related to the formation of DAOs, initial coin offerings and other token disbursement programs

Tax Planning and Structuring

  • Evaluating the treatment of cryptocurrencies and derivatives on cryptocurrencies under rules applicable to repurchase and lending transactions, straddles, wash sales, constructive sales, mandatory and elective mark- to-market recognition of gains and losses
  • Evaluating tax consequences of cryptocurrency investments to different taxpayers in light of IRS guidance that cryptocurrencies are "property" and applicable tax treatment of air drops, staking, lending, other DeFi activities, including grantor trust and publicly traded partnership issues
  • Determining whether a fund is engaged in a US-trade or business and evaluating the application of safe harbor rules to various cryptocurrencies

Corporate and M&A Practice

  • Advising clients on public market mergers and acquisitions with and of crypto and blockchain companies
  • Guidance on infrastructure partnership and commercial arrangements with organizations that mint and issue digital assets
  • Assistance with entity formation, financings, and joint ventures for companies creating and developing digital assets
  • Advising on the integration of digital assets into advertising, marketing, and other consumer-facing activities and related legal considerations


Transaction Highlights

  • Representing the first to market spot litecoin and hedera ETFs
  • Representing the first to market solana staking ETF
  • Representing three of the first to market spot bitcoin ETFs
  • Representing the first to market blockchain ETF
  • Representing the second to market bitcoin futures ETF
  • Advise 1933 Act exchange-traded products on new and novel structures to advance digital asset strategies
  • Represented the sponsors of privately offered single- and multi-digital asset trusts that offer exposure to various cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Polkadot (DOT), Avalanche (AVA), TRON (TRX), Algorand (ALGO), and HBAR, among others, as well as those pursuing a "staking" strategy
  • Advise privately offered trusts holding cryptocurrencies and other digital assets seeking to "uplist" their shares to OTCQX
  • Advise registered investment advisers offering private funds that engage in stablecoin lending to large cryptocurrency exchanges
  • Co-counsel to an institutional cryptocurrency wallet and custody platform in the sale of its institutional bitcoin custody business
  • Represented a financial services firm that serves as a third-party key agent for digital asset/crypto-collateralized loans, including bitcoin- and ether-backed loans, originated by a decentralized platform operated by a financial technology company
  • Represented a cryptocurrency firm in establishing a lending program based upon and backed by cryptocurrency accounts
  • Represented digital asset custodians on regulatory and contract matters
  • Represented a member of a stablecoin consortium project on regulatory and contractual matters
  • Represented sponsors and advisers of registered and private investment vehicles on formation, securities law, and commodities issues, as well as ongoing compliance and best practices
  • Represented digital asset lending platforms on regulatory matters
  • Represented participants on a blockchain-based loan purchase platform
  • Advised a servicing agent on regulatory and contract issues relating to participating in a digital asset lending platform
  • Advised a data platform on regulatory and operational issues

Concentrations

Related Practices

People

Practice Leader

Insights

Cryptocurrency, Digital Assets, and Blockchain Updates

Engagements

News and Events

July 13, 2026

On-Chain Spotlight

Read our synopsis of key regulatory, market, and litigation developments shaping the blockchain and digital assets industry:

Regulatory Developments

  • July 7: The SEC has announced proposed rules aimed at providing clearer regulatory frameworks for crypto assets, including specific exemptions and amendments to broker-dealer obligations, with the goal of fostering innovation and encouraging markets to remain in the US while enhancing investor protections – read the proposed rule list here.

  • July 7: Sony Bank’s crypto-focused US trust company, Connectia Trust, received preliminary conditional approval from the OCC to operate as a national trust bank for stablecoin issuance and crypto custody, moving it closer to launching in New York. The approval is subject to regulatory requirements before Connectia can begin operations – read more in this article.

  • July 7: Coinbase obtained a MiFID investment services license in the UK, enabling it to offer derivatives and equities alongside crypto trading on a single platform for UK users. This positions the company as a comprehensively regulated provider in the market ahead of the UK's forthcoming full crypto regime – read the press release here.

  • July 6: Ripple has received Crypto Asset Service Provider (CASP) authorization from Luxembourg’s financial regulator, making it fully compliant with the EU’s MiCA framework. Ripple now holds more than 75 regulatory licenses globally and joins other major firms, such as Kraken and Coinbase, in securing approval under MiCA – read the press release here.

Market Developments

  • July 10: Coinbase announced that Chief Legal Officer and Secretary Paul Grewal will step down effective July 31, 2026, with Molly Abraham (currently VP, Legal) set to succeed him as General Counsel. We commend Paul for his leadership and for helping pioneer legal and regulatory engagement at the intersection of digital assets and traditional financial services – read more in this article.
  • July 10: A consortium led by the GenLayer Foundation and backed by 27 firms including OKX, MetaMask and Matter Labs is launching an “Internet Court” protocol intended to provide interoperable payments, escrow, and machine-speed dispute resolution for AI agent-to-agent transactions. The aim is to bridge fragmented agentic commerce standards so AI agents can enforce and resolve contested financial commitments without relying on traditional courts – visit the webpage here.
  • July 10: Hyundai has put a stablecoin-based internal cross-border payment system into production on the Avalanche blockchain, using live USD/USDT transfers between its US and Mexico subsidiaries as a treasury management use case. The initial $20,000 pilot reportedly settled in about seven minutes (versus hours via traditional rails), with planned expansion to additional currencies and a forthcoming Europe pilot with Circle (USDC) and Visa to test local-currency transfers and FX costs – read more in this article.
  • July 9: Aave Labs has launched Stable Vaults, a smart contract solution that enables businesses to embed fixed-rate stablecoin yield into their products without custom infrastructure. The system allows companies to select supported stablecoins, yield strategies, and payout rates, streamlining integration of DeFi yields across a variety of use cases – visit the product page here.
  • July 9: Swift has announced that its blockchain-based global ledger is ready for use, with 17 banks launching pilot transactions to enable 24/7 cross-border payments using tokenized deposits. The platform aims to extend bank-grade security and compliance to digital money while supporting innovation in programmable payments, as the cross-border payments landscape continues to diversify with strong adoption – read the press release here.
  • July 8: BNB Chain is developing a new Layer 1 blockchain designed for agentic trading. The new chain, planned to begin testnet by the end of 2026 and a mainnet launch in 2027, will feature quantum-resistant security measures and integration with the existing BNB ecosystem via native bridging – read more in this article.
  • July 7: Strike has introduced bitcoin-backed loans designed to eliminate forced liquidation risk due to price volatility, allowing borrowers to retain their collateral as long as payment obligations are met, marking an innovation in crypto lending products – visit this article to learn more.
  • July 7: Gemini has launched zero-commission stock trading for most US users as part of its strategy to offer an integrated “super app” covering both crypto and traditional financial products, with Nasdaq providing market data and Apex Clearing handling custody and clearing – read more in this article.
  • July 6: Klarna has applied to establish an FDIC-insured US bank in Utah, signaling a shift by fintech firms toward obtaining their own bank charters rather than relying on third-party partners. If approved, the charter would allow Klarna to fund lending with customer deposits and expand its US financial product offerings in-house – read more in this article.
  • July 3: Spotify requested that prediction markets Kalshi and Polymarket remove its branding after manipulated streaming data, used to settle multimillion-dollar song ranking bets, raised concerns over the integrity of event-driven prediction markets and the incentive to influence real-world outcomes – read more in this article.
  • July 1: Kraken’s parent company Payward has acquired Reap to enhance its B2B financial infrastructure, aiming to expand globally regulated infrastructure for stablecoin payments and card issuance, enabling partners to leverage embedded card issuance, cross-border payments, and stablecoin-based treasury management via a unified platform – visit this article to learn more.
  • June 11: Coinbase’s advisory council raised governance questions about “abandoned” or quantum-vulnerable coins after post-quantum migrations, urging the start of technical migration work immediately – read more in this article and get the full report here.

Litigation, Enforcement, and Examination Developments

  • July 7: A federal judge denied Kalshi’s bid to block New York from enforcing its gambling laws against the platform’s sports prediction markets, ruling that Kalshi had not shown federal derivatives law preempts state regulation. Thereafter, Kalshi filed an interlocutory appeal to the Second Circuit, intensifying ongoing legal battles across multiple circuits over federal versus state authority to regulate prediction markets – read the denial here and the interlocutory appeal here.
  • July 7: After Mazars abruptly withdrew as Kraken’s auditor following regulatory scrutiny, Kraken sued for $22 million in arbitration-awarded damages linked to compliance and acquisition costs – read more in this article and Kraken's response here.
  • July 6: A Connecticut federal judge granted Digital Currency Group permission to appeal to the Second Circuit on whether Genesis’s crypto lending agreements qualify as securities under federal law, following a class action related to the subsidiary’s collapse – read this article to learn more.
  • July 6: Circle Internet Financial has asked a Massachusetts federal court to confirm arbitral awards in its favor against Heka Funds SICAV PLC, following arbitration over alleged market manipulation and contract disputes involving Circle's USDC stablecoin. The arbitrator previously awarded Circle attorney fees and expert costs, finding Heka acted in bad faith while pursuing its $49 million damages claim – read more in this article and read the filing here.
  • July 2: OFAC has sanctioned 134 cryptocurrency wallet addresses linked to ISIS-K, including 131 Tron addresses receiving over $1.4 million in crypto, with Tether promptly freezing the associated balances – read more in this article.
  • July 2: A crypto developer is asking the Fifth Circuit to revive his suit seeking clarity that his noncustodial crowdfunding platform will not violate federal money transmission laws, arguing DOJ guidance does not eliminate the risk of prosecution – read more in this article.

Download a PDF of this newsletter.

  Join our Blockchain and Digital Assets mailing list.  

White button that says Subscribe.


 
Upcoming

Connect with our attorneys at these industry events.

 
 
Blue graphic that says Sponsor ETFGI Global ETFs Insights Summit September 29 New York, NY
 
 
Blue graphic that says Sponsor Fordham Law Blockchain Regulatory Symposium October 5 New York, NY
 
 
Blue graphic that says Sponsor Money20/20 Oct. 18–21 Las Vegas, NV.
 
 
 
 
 
 

Past Editions

July

Download a PDF of the July 6, 2026 edition.


June

Download a PDF of the June 29, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the June 22, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the June 15, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the June 8, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the June 2, 2026 edition.


May

Download a PDF of the May 26, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the May 18, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the May 11, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the May 4, 2026 edition.

April

Download a PDF of the April 27, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the April 20, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the April 13, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the April 7, 2026 edition.

March

Download a PDF of the March 30, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the March 26, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the March 16, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the March 6, 2026 edition.

February

Download a PDF of the February 27, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the February 20, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the February 13, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the February 6, 2026 edition.

January

Download a PDF of the January 23, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the January 16, 2026 edition.

Download a PDF of the January 9, 2026 edition.


   

Join our Blockchain and Digital Assets mailing list.

Blue button that says Subscribe

GENIUS Act Tracker

As of June 22, 2026

Jump to: GENIUS Act Rulemaking Timeline  |  GENIUS Act Reporting Requirements


Download a PDF of this page.


The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act (the “GENIUS Act”) enacted in July 2025 instructs the prudential bank regulators and the U.S. Treasury to promulgate regulations, and coordinate as appropriate, implementing the GENIUS Act. Majority of the implementation final rules must be promulgated are within one year of the statute’s effective date, and GENIUS Act officially takes effect on the earlier of January 18, 2027, or 120 days after final rules are issued. The timeline to promulgate each regulation is set out below along with updates on the status of the notice and comment processes that each of the FDIC, the Federal Reserve, OCC, NCUA, and the Department of the Treasury (FinCEN/OFAC) have initiated to comply with the rulemaking requirements set out in the GENIUS Act.

GENIUS Act Rulemaking Timeline

Required Rulemaking Responsible Regulator Timeline to Promulgate Required Regulation Status GENIUS Act Section
Issuance and treatment of payment stablecoins Treasury Secretary July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on GENIUS Act Implementation issued by the Department of Treasury on September 18, 2025; as published in the Federal Register on September 19, 2025 (“Treasury ANPRM”). Comment period closed November 4, 2025. §§3(c)-(d)
12 U.S.C. § 5902
Capital, liquidity, risk management, amendments to capital requirements

FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, NCUA, and any applicable State Payment Stablecoin Regulator

July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment)

Implementing the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act for the Issuance of Stablecoins by Entities Subject to the Jurisdiction of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued on February 25, 2026; as published in the Federal Register on March 2, 2026 (“OCC Implementation NPRM”). Comment period closes May 1, 2026.

GENIUS Act Requirements and Standards for FDIC‑Supervised Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuers and Insured Depository Institutions issued on April 7, 2026; as published in the Federal Register on April 10, 2026 (“FDIC Implementation NPRM”).

Implementing the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act for the Issuance of Stablecoins by Entities Subject to the Jurisdiction of the National Credit Union Administration; as published in the Federal Register on May 18, 2026 ("NCUA Implementation NPRM"). Comment period closes July 17, 2026.

§ 4(a)(4)
12 U.S.C. § 5903(a)(4)
PPSI BSA and Economic Sanctions Compliance Standards

FDIC

July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment)

Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions Compliance Standards for FDIC-Supervised Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuers on May 22, 2026; as published in the Federal Register on June 06, 2026 (“FDIC Comment Request”). Comment period closes August 04, 2026.

§ 4(a)(4)(A)(iv) of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(4)(A)(iv))
Rules applying BSA/AML and sanctions obligations to permitted payment stablecoin issuers Treasury Secretary Presumed—July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) deadline may apply Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuer Anti‑Money Laundering/Countering the Financing of Terrorism Program and Sanctions Compliance Program Requirements issued on April 8, 2026; as published in the Federal Register on April 10, 2026 (“Treasury AML NPRM”). Comment period closes June 9, 2026.

§ 4(a)(5)(B)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(a)(5)(B)

PPSI Customer Identification Program (“CIP”) Requirements

FinCEN, jointly with OCC, Federal Reserve, FDIC, NCUA

[TBD]

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuer Customer Identification Program issued on June 18, 2026; as published in the Federal Register on June 22, 2026 (“PPSI Customer Identification Program NPRM”). Comment period closes August 21, 2026.

§ 4(a)(5)(A)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(a)(5)(A)

General regulations for financial stability and implementation of the principal requirements of § 4(a) OCC, in coordination with other relevant payment stablecoin regulators July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) OCC Implementation NPRM

§ 4(b)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(b)
General regulations for implementation of and compliance with the principal requirements of § 4(a)

FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, NCUA, and any applicable State Payment Stablecoin Regulator

July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment)

OCC Implementation NPRM

FDIC Implementation NPRM

NCUA Implementation NPRM

§ 4(h)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(h)
Processes for applications by, and regulation and supervision of, Federal‑qualified payment stablecoin issuers

FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA

July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment)

OCC Implementation NPRM

FDIC Implementation NPRM

Investments in and Licensing of Permitted Payment Stablecoins Issuers issued on February 11, 2026; as published in the Federal Register on February 12, 2026 (“NCUA Licensing NPRM”). Comment period closed April 13, 2026.

Approval Requirements for Issuance of Payment Stablecoins by Subsidiaries of FDIC‑Supervised Insured Depository Institutions issued on December 16, 2025; as published in the Federal Register on December 19, 2025 (“FDIC Licensing NPRM”). Comment period extended from February 17, 2026 to May 18, 2026.

§ 5(a)(2)(A)

12 U.S.C. § 5904(a)(2)
Regulation of payment stablecoin issuance FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment)

OCC Implementation NPRM

FDIC Implementation NPRM

NCUA Implementation NPRM

NCUA Licensing NPRM

FDIC Licensing NPRM

§ 5(g)

12 U.S.C. § 5904(g)

Federal Reserve backup enforcement authority against State‑qualified permitted payment stablecoin issuers in unusual and exigent circumstances

Federal Reserve July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Pending

§ 7(e)(1)(B)

12 U.S.C. § 5906(e)(2)

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency backup enforcement authority against State‑qualified permitted payment stablecoin issuers that are nonbanks in unusual and exigent circumstances

OCC July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) OCC Implementation NPRM

§ 7(e)(1)(B)

12 U.S.C. § 5906(e)(2)
Criteria regarding resumption of compliance by a foreign payment stablecoin issuer Treasury Secretary July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Treasury ANPRM

§ 8(b)(3)(B)

12 U.S.C. § 5907(b)(3)(B)
Standards for registration requests and appeals process of foreign payment stablecoin issuers OCC July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) OCC Implementation NPRM

§ 18(c)(1)(E)

12 U.S.C. § 5916(c)(1)(E)
Rules implementing the anti‑tying provision and permitting exceptions Federal Reserve, in consultation with the FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA as related to exceptions to the anti‑tying provision No deadline—regulators “may” issue such orders Pending

§ 4(a)(8)(B)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(a)(8)(B)
Rules clarifying the application of ownership limitations, including restrictions on payment stablecoin issuance by U.S. public companies and companies not domiciled in the United States that are “not predominantly engaged” in financial activities Stablecoin Certification Review Committee (Treasury Secretary, Federal Reserve Chair, and FDIC Chair) July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Pending

§ 4(a)(12)(D)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(a)(12)
Principles for assessment of whether state regulatory frameworks are “substantially similar” to federal frameworks Treasury Secretary Presumed—July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) deadline may apply GENIUS Act Broad‑Based Principles for Determining Whether a State‑Level Regulatory Regime Is Substantially Similar to the Federal Regulatory Framework issued on April 1, 2026; as published in the Federal Register on April 3, 2026 (“Treasury Substantially Similar NPRM”). Comment period closes June 2, 2026.

§ 4(c)(2)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(c)(2)

Certifications from state payment stablecoin regulators that the state‑level regulatory regime satisfies applicable criteria and is “substantially similar” to the federal framework, and annual recertifications of the accuracy of the initial certification

State Payment Stablecoin Regulator July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Pending

§ 4(c)(4)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(c)(4)

Established process for expedited review of state regimes for substantial similarity to the federal regime if the state has a prudential regulatory regime in effect by January 14, 2026

Stablecoin Certification Review Committee (Treasury Secretary, Federal Reserve Chair, and FDIC Chair) Responsible regulator shall endeavor for the process must be in effect by January 14, 2026 to enable expedited review Pending

§ 4(c)(7)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(c)(7)
State‑level requirements for state‑qualified payment stablecoin issuers may be issued to the same extent as federal regulations State Payment Stablecoin Regulator No deadline—regulators “may” issue such orders Pending

§ 7(d)

12 U.S.C. § 5906(d)
Public comment on anti‑money laundering innovation Treasury Secretary Beginning August 17, 2025 for a period of 60 days

Treasury ANPRM

Treasury Issues Request for Comment Related to the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act issued on August 18, 2025; comment period closed October 17, 2025 (“Treasury Illicit Finance RFC”).

§ 9(a)

12 U.S.C. § 5908(a)
Rulemaking to mitigate illicit financial activity FinCEN July 18, 2028 (three years after enactment) Pending

§ 9(d)

12 U.S.C. § 5908(a)
Prescribe terms and conditions under which exceptions to custody requirements apply FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA No deadline—regulators “may” issue such orders Pending

§ 10(c)(2)(C)

12 U.S.C. § 5909(c)(2)(C)
Assessment of the necessity of interoperability standards among permitted payment stablecoin issuers and the broader digital finance ecosystem FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA, in consultation with NIST Unclear—July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) deadline may apply Pending

§ 12

12 U.S.C. § 5912
Review of existing regulations applicable to regulated entities

FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA

Unclear—July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) deadline may apply

Pending

NCUA Implementation NPRM

§ 16(b)

12 U.S.C. § 5915(b)
Issuance of rules that may be required to regulate foreign payment stablecoin issuers offering and selling payment stablecoins in the United States Treasury Secretary July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Treasury ANPRM

§ 18(b)(6)

12 U.S.C. § 5916(b)(6)
Creation and implementation of reciprocal arrangements or bilateral agreements between the U.S. and comparable payment stablecoin regulatory regimes Treasury Secretary July 18, 2027 (two years after enactment) Treasury ANPRM

§ 18(d)(3)

12 U.S.C. § 5916(d)(3)

GENIUS Act Reporting Requirements

In addition to the rulemaking activity summarized above, the GENIUS Act requires the primary federal payment stablecoin regulators, including the FDIC, NCUA, Federal Reserve and OCC for banks and the OCC for non-bank and state-supervised PPSIs, the Treasury Secretary and/or the Attorney General, to produce reports for the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate; the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives; or the Director of the Office of Financial Research, as summarized below.

Required Reports Responsible Regulator Due Date Status GENIUS Act Section
Justification for the determination of Unusual and Exigent Circumstances in approving safe harbors Treasury Secretary Prior to issuing such safe harbor Pending

§ 3(c)

12 U.S.C. § 5902
National security coordination with permitted payment stablecoin issuers Attorney General and Treasury Secretary July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Pending

§ 4(a)(6)(C)

12 U.S.C. § 5903(a)(6)(C)

Notification to Congress upon beginning the processing of applications from prospective permitted payment stablecoin issuers

FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA As‑needed Pending

§ 5(e)

12 U.S.C. § 5904(e)

Annual reports to Congress on applications from prospective permitted payment stablecoin issuers that have been pending for at least 180 days

FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA Annually Pending

§ 5(e)

12 U.S.C. § 5904(e)
Reports regarding secondary trading of a payment stablecoin issued by a foreign payment stablecoin issuer Treasury Secretary As‑needed within seven days after the applicable waiver or license is issued Pending

§ 8(c)(4)

12 U.S.C. § 5907(c)(4)
Report addressing illicit finance‑related recommendations, including detection, risk assessment, and legislative recommendations Treasury Secretary January 14, 2026 (180 days after enactment) Report to Congress from the Secretary of the Treasury on Innovative Technologies to Counter Illicit Finance Involving Digital Assets (March 2026)

§ 9(e)

12 U.S.C. § 5908(e)
Report providing findings of a study regarding insolvency proceedings of permitted payment stablecoin issuers FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, and NCUA July 18, 2028 (three years after enactment) Pending

§ 11(h)

12 U.S.C. § 5910
Report confirming and describing regulations issued to carry out the GENIUS Act Federal Banking Agencies (FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC) January 14, 2026 (180 days after enactment) Pending

§ 13(c)

12 U.S.C. § 5913(c)
Report providing findings of a study of non‑payment stablecoins, including endogenously collateralized stablecoins Treasury Secretary July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Pending

§ 14(a)(2)

12 U.S.C. § 5914(a)(2)
Report providing information on the status of the payment stablecoin industry, including trends, applications for permitted payment stablecoin issuer status, and potential financial stability risks FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, NCUA, and any applicable State Payment Stablecoin Regulator July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment) Pending

§ 15(a)

12 U.S.C. § 5914(a)
Incorporation of the above report into its annual report to Congress pursuant to the Dodd‑Frank Act Financial Stability Oversight Council

Annually, beginning July 18, 2026 (one year after enactment)

Pending

§ 15(b)

12 U.S.C. § 5914(b)

We have always been focused on finance.

  • 1913
    TS Chapman partners with Henry Cutler to form Chapman and Cutler
  • 1st
    Chapman's first client in 1913 is still a client of the firm today
  • 22
    Diverse financial practices serving regional, national, and global clients
  • 6
    Offices across the country and in key US financial centers

Chapman and Cutler LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Strictly Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions. Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. When using a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages. These do not store any personal information.

Marketing Cookies

Marketing cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek